- Joined
- Aug 29, 2012
- Location
- Londonia
Starmer's undoubtedly more professional and has an actual air of ministerialness about him, certainly compared to Johnson. But then so do my slippers.The man is a national embarrassment, utterly shambolic, unserious, unfocused, lazy, and completely disrespected both at home and abroad.
If a Labour PM did a fraction of the shit that Johnson gets up to, they'd be absolutely ripped to shreds.
Sure, Starmer might be a bit boring, but can anyone, with an even remotely straight face, suggest he'd do a worse job than Johnson?
I'd wager the things that make Starmer nigh-on unelectable is his rabid poodle Rayner, his lack of discipline towards party members, his penchant for kneeling and most stunningly, swerving the question about whether only women have cervixes.
People know they're stuck with the Tories and Johnson not out of any love for them, but the knowledge that Labour's woketopian vision is about ten times more detrimental to whatever values the country clings to. A crucial component when trying to win votes of said country