1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Gambling Federation at ICE

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by caruso, Jan 26, 2006.

    Jan 26, 2006
  1. caruso

    caruso Banned User - repetitive violations of 1.6 - troll

    Occupation:
    Casino apologist
    Location:
    England
    I stumbled across Gambling Federation quite by chance on day one of the London ICE; saw "G-Fed" out the corner of my eye, thought "naaaaaah, can't be", took a look at the name tag of one of the reps, saw the surname "Fogli" and nearly crapped myself.

    I spoke briefly to the Fogli cousins Federico and Big Boss Flaviano that day, hoping to get an explanation for their disallowing the $9000 win of a player who did not break any of the stated terms. The case was discussed here, and also at the GPWA board, where it was principally mediated - a mediation which failed to recover a cent for the player, although he subsequently received back all his deposits after Bryan Bailey got onto them.

    I asked Federico what they considered "fraud" – financial fraud, or more than this? Yes, more. The Foglis consider both financial fraud and "game fraud"; game fraud being new to me, I asked Federico for clarification. On this matter we got no further than "play patterns", which was consistent with the comments made by all those GPWA members who expressed an opinion.

    Beyond this Federico would not go, but suggested I speak to their Director Of Operations, Clovis Cuqui, who could give me more details. We fixed an appointment for the next day.

    Flaviano came across just before I left. I recapped a bit of what I'd detailed to Federico, and stressed that the opinion that rules are binding was one shared by most of the online gambling community, including the likes of Bryan Bailey. It was an amusing moment when Flaviano gave a theatrical and dismissive gesture with his hands and with his heavy Italian accent said "Bryan?? He ALWAYS disagree with us!!"

    I spoke with Clovis the next day. He's a very pleasant fellow indeed, and he gave me fully 45 minutes of his time, in the process making himself late for his subsequent appointment by 20 minutes.

    "Game fraud": what is it, and how can you fairly hold gamblers to something like this which is not detailed in ANY term or ANY condition, anywhere?

    Game fraud, for Gambling Federation, is playing in a way designed to optimise the bonus, on the part of a player who clearly has no intention of a lasting relationship with the casino beyond said bonus. That this apparent fraud is not listed is not inconsistent with aspects of financial fraud, every aspect of which – chargebacks, fake credit cards etc etc ad inf – is not necessarily detailed. If all aspects of genuine financial fraud are not detailed, why is it inconsistent to not detail aspects of game fraud?

    I pointed out that financial fraud, and all aspects thereof, are commonly understood by the gambling public, whether or not all possible aspects are listed. "Game fraud" is not - and that to claim the two are identically understood is pretty rich. In fact, "game fraud" is an online casino invention. I asked Clovis how a player is to KNOW about this, and if any player would ever touch a Gambling Federation casino knowing that they might confiscate winnings on the basis of "game fraud".

    Clovis made two points: in the first place, the majority of their player base will never encounter this problem, and barely even understand or sympathise with the issue, because the practice is the realm of only a specific player-type, the advantage player, who is very much in the minority. In the second place, this player, the advantage player, knows exactly what he is doing. He is no injured innocent, and must accept winnings-confiscation as part of the risks of the trade - he is creating the problem for himself by these tactics. Also, the player in question received back all his deposits. I should add that Clovis had a VERY clear understanding of the nature of the player's play: he was not just bitching about paying a big winner.

    I tried to generalise the issue with this question:

    As a player, if I follow, and infringe none of, the stated rules, is it unreasonable of me to expect to be paid?

    Clovis's response was to say that no, it was not an unreasonable expectation on my part. However, he maintained that it was also not unreasonable for Gambling Federation to apply their own rules, stated or otherwise, on a case-by-case basis.

    I then asked: if Gambling Federation were operating within a regulated environment, how long would they last? Clearly, the likes of Microgaming and Cryptologic would not have much of a problem. Gambling Federation, applying unstated rules at their discretion, would surely not last a day?

    Clovis's answer was that in the event of operating within the jurisdiction of a regulatory body they would apply the rules of said jurisdiction. These would be many and varied, dependent on the body in question. Outside of any such jurisdiction, they apply their rules as they see fit so to do. They cannot apply such rules when such rules don’t exist.

    He also threw into the melting pot that no affiliate would be affected by things like this, and that affiliate payments would not change in any way. I'm not sure why I was told this because I didn't initiate the matter, although I did mention Cindy Carley (the GPWA mediator) - for no reason other than hoping to give myself some street-cred as someone who knew what they were talking about. I cannot see how a $9000 payment would not affect the affiliate's commission, however, otherwise the books don't balance.

    As I said above, this was an extremely pleasant and likeable fellow, who gave me far more of his time than he should have and I think probably pissed off his boss, Flaviano, for the rest of the day for being so late for his next meeting. In fact, it was I who called an end to our chat – he gave absolutely no indication of being in any kind of a rush at any point.

    However, I disagree with Clovis in several areas.

    In the first place, that the player receives back his deposits does NOT level the playing field, because he does NOT receive them back when he LOSES – this is a crucial difference. If winning results in no more than your deposits back you are at an almighty disadvantage, because at the risk of stating the obvious, gambling is not just about losing or breaking even. Winning comes into the equation.

    In the second place, although I understand where they are coming from on the matter of advantage players who know what they’re doing, the "regular" gamblers having no problems etc etc etc, I do not support that undisclosed aspects of "game fraud" is an acceptable way to behave - and neither does the industry at large, let's face it. At the end of the day, I cannot believe that any player, slot junkie or smart, would willingly deposit at any casino that's known to behave in this way. On the basis of this alone, Gambling Federation can never have my own seal of approval.
     
    20 people like this.
  2. Jan 26, 2006
  3. Simmo!

    Simmo! Moderator Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Web Dev.
    Location:
    England
    Interesting post caruso :thumbsup:

    I hadn't realised you were there til i met Greedyirl in the evening...wish i could have bumped into you...next time :)
     
  4. Jan 26, 2006
  5. paul02085

    paul02085 Senior Member

    Occupation:
    Fishing :)
    Location:
    USA
    Caruso, thanks so much for this. I am going to start calling you Geraldo (as in Rivera). :) You gathered alot of good information by asking tough questions and not backpedaling.

    So what did i learn? Since i am an advantage player, I will never put one cent in one of their ubiquitous casinos. (Of course, i already held this view, but your interview certainly cemented my opinion.)

    GF will not miss me as i will not miss them, fair enough.
     
  6. Jan 26, 2006
  7. Mousey

    Mousey Ueber Meister Mouse CAG

    Occupation:
    Pencil Pusher
    Location:
    Up$hitCreek
    And do they employ a psychic to tell them when a player has no intention of a 'lasting relationship with the casino beyond said bonus'? If they know a player's intentions, then don't accept the poor sap's deposit in the first place!

    I've always thought of game fraud as a player using a computer to interfere with and affect the game in the casino software. Shows how much I know.

    Now I know I must think fine thoughts when I deposit at casinos (especially if I take a bonus), mentally relaying an intention to give said casino heavy play from that day forth.

    Fine info Caruso, much appreciated!
     
  8. Jan 26, 2006
  9. paul02085

    paul02085 Senior Member

    Occupation:
    Fishing :)
    Location:
    USA
    LOL:lolup: You must use the Vulcan mind meld as Mr. Spock did.
     
  10. Jan 26, 2006
  11. suzecat

    suzecat Dormant account CAG MM webmeister

    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    California
    Now I thought "game fraud" was when a casino sneaked malicious code in their downloads that provided them an unsavory advantage!

    Caruso I can just imagine how surprised you were to see Gfed at ICE! WOW, takes BIG brass ones!

    So what can be taken from this whole lot? Hummm, I guess you are OK if you deposit and lose your cash.....but you are NOT OK if you deposit and win? Seems that Gfed should form a group that customers pay to use their software -- with no anticipation of ever receiving any win -- .............oh yeah, they have that!

    I won't even go there about certain Italians and mob history.........
     
  12. Jan 26, 2006
  13. vedat

    vedat Dormant account

    Location:
    TURKEY
    trying to win in a casino is fraud lol

    come on who plays to lose every body knows they will lose but they have hope that they can win and when they win they should pay with bonus or with out (if terms is met) even casino manager think its fraud avoid all gambling federation casinos at all cost
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2006
  14. Jan 27, 2006
  15. JohnGalt

    JohnGalt Dormant account

    Location:
    iugljk
    I really wonder how they know who is just after the bonus and who wants to be a "real customer". The way I like to play is the same with or without a bonus and works good for both. I play some slots and things sometimes, but usually what I like to do is deposit for a medium-smallish amount, play blackjack and try to double or triple up my stake, maybe go after a bigger win sometimes, then cashout.

    Would they consider this trying to rip them off? How am I supposed to know? You're right about financial fraud- everyone knows what's not allowed, there are rules about it. But what makes for game fraud? Any gameplay that's not guaranteed to lose all your money?? He makes it sound like there's some secret forumla, but what could it be? It just can't possibly be accurate, can it?

    And he makes it sound like there are only two types of players, but aren't there some in between, some who like to play with bonuses to try out a casino and stick with the ones they like? Isn't that what lots of people do? Where do they fall under this test?
     

Share This Page