It's not that they can't or that it is wrong to change terms. It is just not good faith to try to sneak them in and catch regular players unaware.
Fortune Lounge has without fanfare or notice doubled their wagering requirements. This has let some players in for a surprise on cashing out.
One had to go to the their WebSite's terms page to know and some that had played weekly (including VIP players) don't understand why FL didn't just highlight the change in their weekly bonus offer. Why hide it?
Wagering now requires players to wager their deposit once to receive the bonus and then wager the bonus and deposit 10 times instead of their normal 5 times. These are not 100% match bonus. Often they are only 10%. So for a $10 bonus for $100 deposit the player is looking at wagering $1,200.
However, there may be something of a positive nature. Fortune lounge is considering doing away with the carryover feature of their wagers. At 5X a minor irritation, carrying over after bust out is a major problem at 10X. I applaud FL for listening their players and considering doing away with this requirement.
Their statement and I assume forthcoming announcement can be found here:
A good article from SpearMaster on this practice (10 Stupid Casino Tricks) can be found here:
Stanford
Fortune Lounge has without fanfare or notice doubled their wagering requirements. This has let some players in for a surprise on cashing out.
One had to go to the their WebSite's terms page to know and some that had played weekly (including VIP players) don't understand why FL didn't just highlight the change in their weekly bonus offer. Why hide it?
Wagering now requires players to wager their deposit once to receive the bonus and then wager the bonus and deposit 10 times instead of their normal 5 times. These are not 100% match bonus. Often they are only 10%. So for a $10 bonus for $100 deposit the player is looking at wagering $1,200.
However, there may be something of a positive nature. Fortune lounge is considering doing away with the carryover feature of their wagers. At 5X a minor irritation, carrying over after bust out is a major problem at 10X. I applaud FL for listening their players and considering doing away with this requirement.
Their statement and I assume forthcoming announcement can be found here:
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
A good article from SpearMaster on this practice (10 Stupid Casino Tricks) can be found here:
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Stanford