1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

First Blackjack experiences...

Discussion in 'Introduce yourself! (New Members)' started by balcjkcak, Jul 21, 2009.

    Jul 21, 2009
  1. balcjkcak

    balcjkcak Newbie member

    Occupation:
    IT Manager
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Hi All,

    I'm quite new to online gambling, playing online blackjack for a few months now. I believe that I understand well how the statistics behind blackjack work (having a mathematics degree, I should be able to understand this at least :confused:).

    But, subjectively, I find some types of online blackjack variants harder to beat than others. Up to now I played at Microgaming, Playtech and RTG Casinos, always using blackjack variants with surrender option and hole card, if available. I'm playing strictly basic strategy everywhere and use moderate negative progressions (for example d'Alembert rows etc.). My observation up to now is, that all implementations of course do oscillations away from the expected ratio of about 53:47 percent of lost hands to won hands (without pushs) to peak situations between 73:27 and 35:65 lost/won ratios. But length and occurance rate of these peaks largely differs between them: Peaks are short and seldom in Microgaming, long and seldom in Playtech, short and very often in RTG.

    This leads, at least with my current playing sceme, to quite consistent winnings with Microgaming's and Playtech's blackjacks, but to bad losses with the RTG ones.

    So, just to make a long story short: I'd be quite interested to know, whether other blackjack players made similar observations, or if I've just not played long enough to experience the same kind of oscillations (aka streaks ;)) in all implementations.

    Thanks for your opinions...

    Cheers, Juergen
     
  2. Jul 21, 2009
  3. funeral979

    funeral979 Senior Member PABaccred

    Occupation:
    retail
    Location:
    Texas
  4. Jul 21, 2009
  5. balcjkcak

    balcjkcak Newbie member

    Occupation:
    IT Manager
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Hi Funeral979,

    thanks a lot for pointing me to your thread concerning RTG blackjack odds. It's quite interesting to read the opinions. But, just to make it clear: I don't think that there is anything tweaked with RTG's software... it's just the subjective feeling or "rhythm" of the RTG game that results for me in not being able to play it successfully. I've made lots of statistical evaluations and didn't find any obvious irregularity except this extraordinary streaky behaviour (and even the average sum of streaks of a given length per x hands isn't deviant from other blackjack implementations). The streaks (winnig and losing ones) simply come when you are not prepared to handle them (so, if there was anything tweaked, then this would be a masterpiece in psychology)

    So, my question was just meant that simple: Do others also "find it hard" to win against RTG's blackjack, just the feeling, not the math...

    Cheers, Juergen
     
  6. Jul 22, 2009
  7. marioking24

    marioking24 Quit Gambling PABnononaccred PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    College Student
    Location:
    Cottbus/Germany
    Yes... to me it seemed to be impossible to win something on RTG BJ... I have played multiple thousand hands on it. Normaly it wins a little bit in the beginning and then it is just loosing.
    Microgaming seems to be random
     

Share This Page