vinylweatherman
You type well loads
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2004
- Location
- United Kingdom
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Edited to show what stood out besides the normal stuff. I tried to contact the only thing I saw (me@mcmike.nl) where they got that info, but it bounced back.
Dec. 3
Well, if you’re a USA online gambler who used EwalletXpress, you can no longer use this e-wallet to gamble online. Customers with funds in their account should get their money back soon. The authorities are now meticulously auditing EwalletXpress’s finances, and will claim any and all available funds for customers that used this processing option. This applies for both casino and sportsbook customers, since EwalletXpress offered its services to many different types of online gaming sites. When all is said and done, the only parties left holding the bag will be websites who have now lost thousands, if not millions, in player deposits.
This might be why they are saying nothing about it. They either hope to get the money back, or are afraid to admit such large losses in case players feel this has driven them close to the edge.
This statement doesn't look like a seizue, more of a "winding up order" after a company has been found with "it's fingers in the till", and the money has been frozen not by the DoJ, but by the CANADIAN authorities, perhaps with a view to press CRIMINAL charges. This looks more like an attempt was made to embezzle the funds, and it got busted by the authorities, who are now trying to trace the money to return it to customers. The latter part suggests that "consumers (players)" come first in any distribution, before "merchants (casinos)" get theirs. It is probably going to be Canadians before Americans too.
Remember, this is a CANADIAN company with CANADIAN customers, and is not JUST used for online gambling. There may be Canadian customers who only used the wallet for shopping without having to hand card details directly to the merchant, the same way Neteller bills it's Net+ card as being "more secure" than using your credit card directly.
It may be that they were found to have issued more eMoney than they could back with REAL money.
If this is a CRIMINAL investigation, rather than a "Federal seizue", it would explain the lack of information from "official" sources.