QUOTE: Hence why I think a neutral disclaimer/warning about these places isn't a bad idea. As long as it is neutral and not name-calling ... UNQUOTE
I agree, Mac.
Wheresmymoney, good luck with getting your PAB resolved.
Bpb makes a good point when he says:
QUOTE: Since that time, I've received approximately 200 emails from other Crystal Palace casinos, offering me bonuses. To the same email address I used to sign up at the casino where I was barred. They could easily remove me from the promotions mailing list. They haven't. I've even requested that I be removed from the promotions mailing list. I haven't. UNQUOTE
This seems to be a common fault in many casino marketing departments/companies - the seeming impossibility of getting removed from a promo mailing list and the consequent confusion between promo offers and locked accounts.
It's inexcusable, especially once the casino operator has been made aware of repeated problems in this area.
It's not smart in a business sense either, because instead of writing off a player completely with an irrevocable lock-out there is always the option of barring him/her from future promos without closing the account. But if they can't get their act together in reconciling their locked or barred players with their promo list, then the whole situation becomes a lose-lose for all involved.
I agree, Mac.
Wheresmymoney, good luck with getting your PAB resolved.
Bpb makes a good point when he says:
QUOTE: Since that time, I've received approximately 200 emails from other Crystal Palace casinos, offering me bonuses. To the same email address I used to sign up at the casino where I was barred. They could easily remove me from the promotions mailing list. They haven't. I've even requested that I be removed from the promotions mailing list. I haven't. UNQUOTE
This seems to be a common fault in many casino marketing departments/companies - the seeming impossibility of getting removed from a promo mailing list and the consequent confusion between promo offers and locked accounts.
It's inexcusable, especially once the casino operator has been made aware of repeated problems in this area.
It's not smart in a business sense either, because instead of writing off a player completely with an irrevocable lock-out there is always the option of barring him/her from future promos without closing the account. But if they can't get their act together in reconciling their locked or barred players with their promo list, then the whole situation becomes a lose-lose for all involved.
Last edited: