1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Does anyone know where PWC have gone?

Discussion in 'Casino Industry Discussion' started by casino mad, Apr 12, 2007.

    Apr 12, 2007
  1. casino mad

    casino mad Dormant account

    Occupation:
    finance
    Location:
    UK
    Have they pulled out of the casino payout audit business?? As I have not seen a casino with one of their reports since December.

    Most Microgaming casinos have not updated their payout reports the only exception being 32Red who have gone with ecogra.

    Cryptologic casinos Intercasino and Littlewoods have gone with Gaming Associates.

    888.com with iTech labs.

    I suppose this is no surprise as firstly they didn't want their brand mentioned on any online casino site, the US ruling must have been the last straw.
     
  2. Apr 12, 2007
  3. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    I noticed a couple of months ago that I couldn't find the page on their site where they explained their audit process.

    Hmm.
     
  4. Apr 15, 2007
  5. jerryg

    jerryg Dormant account

    It's just as well. The audit was only as accurate as the information passed through by the casino, which is also the case with all of the companies listed in the original post. It is entirely possible for a casino to fudge these results.

    Does this happen? Maybe, maybe not. I don't know and neither does anyone else. However, that alone only goes to demonstrate how useless these audits are.
     
  6. Apr 16, 2007
  7. REOdeathwagon

    REOdeathwagon Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    cabdriver
    Location:
    arizona
    The same company that did Enron's financial reports / audits. New name, same accountants.
     
  8. Apr 16, 2007
  9. EasyRhino

    EasyRhino Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Analyst
    Location:
    San Diego
    That was Arthur Andersen. Different name. Different accountants.
     
  10. Apr 24, 2007
  11. REOdeathwagon

    REOdeathwagon Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    cabdriver
    Location:
    arizona
    You sir, are correct.

    I have no idea where I got the bogus idea that the two firms were connected in some way. (I even remember now the stories of the long ago proposed merger not going through.)
     
  12. Apr 24, 2007
  13. lottethedog

    lottethedog Newbie member

    Occupation:
    Inbetween
    Location:
    Europe
    pwc dont want to be associated with gambling...that is the reason.
     

Share This Page