I am in kind of an argument with a casino that avoids answerring my question. They keep repeating that all of the bet sizes are in accordance with the regulator, blabla. But there just one thing i dont understand.
The casino in particular started to limit bet sizes on certain games. I think i do play there for 3 years and saw various games being debunked from 40 a spin to back 4 a spin. Certain games where over time removed completely, not just due to impopularity but proberly due to liability, the game is perhaps to eager to spit out winnings. Different casino's in the same country, do show the same games with the game as it was intended, including the maximum bet not being restrained.
The difference since this year untill now with playing on both, the uncapped game literally plays 'better' in all ways compared to the capped game version. I'm talking about a few (populair) ones:
Dead or alive
Extra chilli
Pirate gold
Book of ra
Dead or alive
On top of that, why this started, was that the bonus wagering requirement moved upwards from 39x to now 49x. Their mailing initiated me to play, in where they'd offer a bonus of up to 200 euro, but in the TOS it was from 500 deposit or more (lol). Like my 250 euro deposit did'nt matter, as that just offered a 10% return of bonus with a 49x wagering.
So i'm slowly beginning to understand, that all these casino's, except for a few appearantly, are slowly introducing more limited slots, a more of the same money pit tactics where the genuine chances of me, you or anyone else actually winning and withdrawing something, is getting slimmer and slimmer. Everything is well calculated.
I just dont understand why a casino cannot just be straight forward and say yes, we've taken a different approach to our games and offerings, and the reason why we limit certain bets is because of *insert reason* (but mostly financial liability). I remember a year ago, someone was lucky enough to win 90k on DOA. After that the game was capped to a max bet of 7,20 if i'm correct, while others go all the way up to 18 a spin.
I feel like i kind of had to learn the hard way here.
The casino in particular started to limit bet sizes on certain games. I think i do play there for 3 years and saw various games being debunked from 40 a spin to back 4 a spin. Certain games where over time removed completely, not just due to impopularity but proberly due to liability, the game is perhaps to eager to spit out winnings. Different casino's in the same country, do show the same games with the game as it was intended, including the maximum bet not being restrained.
The difference since this year untill now with playing on both, the uncapped game literally plays 'better' in all ways compared to the capped game version. I'm talking about a few (populair) ones:
Dead or alive
Extra chilli
Pirate gold
Book of ra
Dead or alive
On top of that, why this started, was that the bonus wagering requirement moved upwards from 39x to now 49x. Their mailing initiated me to play, in where they'd offer a bonus of up to 200 euro, but in the TOS it was from 500 deposit or more (lol). Like my 250 euro deposit did'nt matter, as that just offered a 10% return of bonus with a 49x wagering.
So i'm slowly beginning to understand, that all these casino's, except for a few appearantly, are slowly introducing more limited slots, a more of the same money pit tactics where the genuine chances of me, you or anyone else actually winning and withdrawing something, is getting slimmer and slimmer. Everything is well calculated.
I just dont understand why a casino cannot just be straight forward and say yes, we've taken a different approach to our games and offerings, and the reason why we limit certain bets is because of *insert reason* (but mostly financial liability). I remember a year ago, someone was lucky enough to win 90k on DOA. After that the game was capped to a max bet of 7,20 if i'm correct, while others go all the way up to 18 a spin.
I feel like i kind of had to learn the hard way here.