1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Discriminations?

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by lojo, Nov 10, 2007.

    Nov 10, 2007
  1. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    Recent issues that may be discriminatory. Each country or region will have its own regulations and peoples will have their opinions. How do you weigh in on these:

    • Sportsbetting: Sportsbook reduces limit of one player to 1% of countryman. $1000:$10 Hungarian playing UK Sportsbook bet365
    • Bonus restrictions by region/residency
    • Bingo site allegedly closing accounts because of players belonging to advocate forum
     
  2. Nov 10, 2007
  3. BingoT

    BingoT Nurses love to give shots webmeister

    Occupation:
    Nursing & Run Bus Trips
    Location:
    Hartford,Ct
    Good for you lojo in looking into this.
    Cheers
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Nov 10, 2007
  5. Simmo!

    Simmo! Moderator Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Web Dev.
    Location:
    England
    I used to run an online record store taking orders for CDs. We had a high amount of fraud from a number of Asian and African countries, so we stopped taking orders from any country in Asia and Africa and our problems stopped overnight and the effect on sales revenue was minimal.

    My point is, if I was running a business dealing with consumers, I would want to be, expect to be, allowed to discriminate against who I like. It's my business and I should be allowed to pick and choose who I sell to. And if people don't like it, then go somewhere else.
     
    5 people like this.
  6. Nov 10, 2007
  7. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    I agree. Others don't (per source threads)

    But can a buffet offer 'all you can eat' to a skinny person and 'limit one plate' to a large person? i.e. sportsbook limits and casino bonus offers?

    Would we expect other rogue behavior from a casino (or bingo site) that closed accounts or refused to pay due to forum activity? (alledged closed accounts atcyberbingo... known refused to pay @Virtual)
     
  8. Nov 10, 2007
  9. BingoT

    BingoT Nurses love to give shots webmeister

    Occupation:
    Nursing & Run Bus Trips
    Location:
    Hartford,Ct
    100% of buffet places are "'all you can eat' :lolup:
    They are great for The Fat one's and they love them skinny people to come they don't eat as much.
     
  10. Nov 10, 2007
  11. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA

    Should casinos and sportsbooks be the same? I can't send out coupons to only skinny people... should everyone be treated equally?

    Of course there is market choice... I can shop where 'my kind' is welcome and not frequent 'discriminators'.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2007
  12. Nov 10, 2007
  13. tencardcharlie

    tencardcharlie Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Bureaucrat
    Location:
    The playboy mansion.
    The important thing IMHO in my opinion is if there is a valid reason for discriminating. If a business, like in Simmo's case, have big problems with fraud from certain countries then that is clearly a sufficent reason to not accept customers from those countries. If, for example, a restaurant doesn't accept people of certain race because the owner's prejudice then that reason is not valid.

    OK

    OK

    Not OK if the reason is to try to silence criticism. Could be OK if there is the forum is linked to some sort of fraudulent activity. Of course all legitimate players must be payed.
     
    1 person likes this.
  14. Nov 10, 2007
  15. chuchu59

    chuchu59 gambling addict CAG PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    EXECUTIVE
    Location:
    SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
    Totally correct. The casino/sportsbook may choose the limits for any of its customers. In return, they can decide whether they want to bet there. Before any outcome, no one knows whether its a winning bet or not so why is it unfair. There must be a balance against so-called discrimination and the right to protect a business through exposure to high bets.
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. Nov 10, 2007
  17. shaunm

    shaunm Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Advertising Executive
    Location:
    Wigan
    If this is the one from the other thread...

    This isn't descrimination, he's had a large bet, and instead or cutting the price to a lot shorter, they have just limited the further amount he can have on it. Happens day in day out at bookmakers
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. Nov 10, 2007
  19. BingoT

    BingoT Nurses love to give shots webmeister

    Occupation:
    Nursing & Run Bus Trips
    Location:
    Hartford,Ct
    Now that is a crazy thing to ask.
    We all now this is a Yes.
    But this is what life is you have many discriminators out in the World today.
    And it's sucks too.
    And it's like my Bus Trips to the casinos I do.
    I was told by someone in the State if I know someone on Welfair and they come with me I should report them.But you know what I can't I can't lower myself to do this to someone.But if I know if this person is very much in debt and they have a family and the family don't have food on the table or a good living quarters this is something different for me to take.
     
    1 person likes this.
  20. Nov 10, 2007
  21. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    I gather that he feels it is discrimination because of the laws or standards of his country of origin.

    Is Hungary EU? Does the EU have such laws? Is UK not yet EU?

    I think VWM asserted in a bonus 'discrimination' discussion that it is not 'cricket' to offer one person a retail offer or coupon without giving the same opportunity to everyone. iirc.
     
  22. Nov 10, 2007
  23. Simmo!

    Simmo! Moderator Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Web Dev.
    Location:
    England
    I agree with your post Tencard except the above bit. I still think it is ok for the Bingo program to stop taking players who frequent a forum. They can choose to a) listen to the critics or b) turn their back on them. If they choose the latter, that should be their choice IMO and that includes shutting them out. If the critics dont like it they can play elsewhere but they are still free to criticise openly.

    It's not dissimilar to a forum. If I ran a forum and people came along and started pissing me off, I'd ban them way quicker than CM ever would. And I should be allowed to - they can go whine elsewhere about how victimised they are but at least life goes on without any hassle on my forum.
     
    2 people like this.
  24. Nov 10, 2007
  25. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    Well, I guess if the state underwrites the transit service, they have the ability to 'discriminate'... it's their money going into the casino? If they don't subsidize the bus service, that was a gestapo action on their part, imo.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2007
  26. Nov 10, 2007
  27. ugaboga

    ugaboga Casino Addict

    Occupation:
    Information Technology, Day Trader
    Location:
    Australia
    I don't think you understand him. His issue is not that he placed $4,000 on one outcome, then tried to place some more on the same outcome.

    He was limited to placing 1% of the previous maximum on all events. In other words, they were limiting his account because he was winning.

    It would be akin to fortune lounge limiting Juliack to $5 maximum bets on Video Poker :)
     
    1 person likes this.
  28. Nov 10, 2007
  29. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    Wouldn't that smack of censorship? Certainly it's the forum owner/moderator's right to control access - but fairness dictates that opposing opinions, respectfully rendered should be tolerated if not encouraged.... Or else we have virtual danny's forum:eek2:
     
  30. Nov 10, 2007
  31. BingoT

    BingoT Nurses love to give shots webmeister

    Occupation:
    Nursing & Run Bus Trips
    Location:
    Hartford,Ct
    The State don't fund this.It's money out of the customers pocket.
    You do have to see it in the States eyes.It's really tax payers money here.
    And I don't look into everyone's life to see what they have.It's really non of my business.But in this business you do hear some good one's.and it can be all hear say too.
     
    1 person likes this.
  32. Nov 10, 2007
  33. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    In the 'real world' odds are always changing. Bet limits are unfair, the odds determine the limits. A large bet would affect the next odds, wouldn't it? I don't use online sportsbooks, so don't know how they work.
     
    1 person likes this.
  34. Nov 10, 2007
  35. shaunm

    shaunm Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Advertising Executive
    Location:
    Wigan
    i understand what you mean. but if there are 99 10 bettors and 1 20,000 bettor, and he/she puts 20,000 on a horse at 10/1, and the bookmaker cuts the price to 6/1, is it fair that all the 10 punters have to take this price? if you limit the big staking bettor, then he has 20,000 at 10/1 and the 10 bettors can get their money on at 10/1 so everyone is happy.
     
    1 person likes this.
  36. Nov 10, 2007
  37. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I think some casino discrimination rules are unreasonable because they don't seem to be related to fraud. If the problem is fraud, they should be fighting that, rather than blocking whole countries.

    Discrimination used to be the norm, and was acceptable only 50 or so years ago, but the groups discriminated against fought back and have won rights to equal treatment. The rules now require a good reason to be made for discrimination, it is not good enough just to discriminate and not say why.

    Grand Prive were a case in point. They decided to stop giving bonuses to players who used the British Pound, as it gave such players an unfair advantage. In order to receive their promotions, players had to use the US Dollar. This wasn't discrimatory, as all players had the choice to use the dollar and receive promotions, or use the pound and not receive them.

    They then added a rule that UK players had to use the pound, and this became discrimination, as the players could not take part on an equal footing by having the same options as all the rest.

    The argument about businesses discriminating on grounds of place of origin is not that clear cut, and here in the UK would be illegal if the discrimination were solely on grounds of things like race, gender, religion etc. Discrimination would be allowed on the basis of an individuals circumstances, and if an individual repeatedly commits fraud they can be banned from the places they have targeted, or may target in the future.

    Discrimination on the internet is hard to police, as the question of juristiction arises, and it would be up to the person discriminated against to make a complaint. Where the country is outside the EU, and the complainant is not on EU soil at the time of discrimination, the business will most likely not be challenged.

    My suspicion with casinos is that they are NOT discriminating due to fraud in many cases, as they would have us believe that US players are above such things, but the Fins are all thieves, along with the Danes. It seems the discrimination is against small countries, but with the US they will swallow the cost of the fraud (naturally, UIGEA has changed everything since).

    It would really take a test case in the courts to see if certain types of discrimination are allowable or not, and it would depend on the reasons given.
    Current arguments exist about discrimination against MEN with car insurance. The insurers are currently allowed to do this, because the discrimination is based on risk assessment, and not purely gender. This, however, may change, as the EU want to outlaw this kind of risk profiling, and require insurers to asess drivers as individuals.

    Casinos can get away with such discrimination because it would be the law in their licencing juristiction that counts, so those moving to Malta had better realise that some of their terms might be subject to challenge, and they may be required to make changes. Because all EU countries are considered equal, it will not be allowable simply to day that one EU country is a hotbed of fraud and another is fine. The EU courts will take the view that if they met the criteria for admittance in the first place, they are no less "safe" than any other for business.
    If anything, the EU rules against discrimination are so extreme that it is the business to prove their innocence, not the complainant to prove guilt, which is the opposite of most other court matters. This is because those that seek to discriminate because of personal prejudice have found ways to frustrate the law, and use "indirect" methods to get rid of those they don't like.

    In the case of the African countries, it would be down to the business to PROVE that the rate of fraud is so high they had no other choice (should the courts decide to accept the matter, that is). There are one or two countries that are deemed so "evil" they sit on official blacklists, and in these cases it IS legal to discriminate against it's citizens, and in some cases it is compulsory.

    What particuarly raises my blood pressure are those casinos that call ME a "fraud" or "fraud risk" just because I live here in England:mad:
     
    3 people like this.
  38. Nov 10, 2007
  39. kaszino

    kaszino Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Gambler
    Location:
    Hungary
    Does a restaurant have the right to tell a guest without any reason, you cannot enter and eat here?
    Does a shop have the right to tell a customer without any reason, you cannot enter and buy here?
    Does a casino have the right to tell the player without any reason, you cannot play here?
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page