orangeindiana
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Location
- Texas
Hopefully I'm not resurrecting a dead topic, but I've searched the forums pretty well about a definition about bonus abuse and still had some questions.
The consensus seemed to say that bonus abuse is when a player demands continued bonuses without meeting wagering requirements, but it's legit for a player to receive a bonus, playing games with the most favorable odds while keeping his bets low until reaching the wagering requirement, and then cashing out.
Is this still the definition? More importantly, is it the definition that most casinos use? I've only been at this for a couple months, but I get the impression that people are being tagged as bonus abusers even when they aren't meeting the forums' definition. I just wanted to see where casinos tend to stand so I can avoid getting into any unnecessary trouble.
The consensus seemed to say that bonus abuse is when a player demands continued bonuses without meeting wagering requirements, but it's legit for a player to receive a bonus, playing games with the most favorable odds while keeping his bets low until reaching the wagering requirement, and then cashing out.
Is this still the definition? More importantly, is it the definition that most casinos use? I've only been at this for a couple months, but I get the impression that people are being tagged as bonus abusers even when they aren't meeting the forums' definition. I just wanted to see where casinos tend to stand so I can avoid getting into any unnecessary trouble.