Dead or Alive II - I hit 30079x bet!!!

[Harry_BKK]

can imagine with a 4x conversion a lot of people not withdrawing the converted amount either once finishing wagering, adding to a lot more overall playthrough. probably find Jono is responsible for a quarter of that 560 million as well.

Anything over 4x bonus amount gets instantly removed once you finished wagering.

 

[Mavericksss]

I have trawled hyper wins, YT etc. and cannot see a non-jackpot hit close to this anywhere. We have the Bonanza 14400x, Jammin' Jars 19,200x but I think this may well be the first to break the 20k x barrier, almost certainly the 30k x bet one.

Queen of Riches x22k record for BTG

 

[brianmon]

You do like to give VS a hit whenever you can, don't you? And defend your beloved Nektan sites who have one of the worst bonus terms as well as are one of the slowest payers.

No it is not a reflection of their cashflow, it is their risk assessment as any sensible business would do.

The Nektan sites can do easier higher bet sizes because a lot of the wagering at their casinos is with bonus money since they hand them out like candy. For that they limit cash conversions to 4x bonus amount or something like that. So their risk is by far lower.

Other casino might limit it too in the future if such hyper wins happen more often. We don't know that. And to be honest, I will not check now all the 3,000+ casinos out there what max bet they have. Could well be that in demo mode they have $18 and in real play it is lower.

Erm... I'm not defending Nektan, in any way shape or form. I don't play at their sites. I was merely pointing out to that poster that Nektan aren't the tin-pot company that most people think they are.

Risk assessment is about what they could comfortably afford to pay out. So of course it's connected to cashflow.
I'm not saying VS are under-funded, but they're maybe not as well-funded as some would think

You only need look at that thread about how VS tried to split a 'Divine Fortune' jackpot up in to seperate payments, and then had to backtrack and stump up the whole amount, because it was a UK player.
Although withdrawals of >50k, may still be delayed upto 30 days, to be paid in full.
Do they still have a maximum withdrawal limit (for no-UK players) in place?

Also any sites I've looked at the max bet at, have been in real play. The majority are at £9 and the bigger sites (Unibet MrGreen etc) are at £18. So I would expect a conscious decision has been made by those sites, when choosing the stake

 

[TheAddict]

Anything over 4x bonus amount gets instantly removed once you finished wagering.

yeah i know man.
i can just imagine a lot of players wagering the deposit, losing, then wagering the bonus and if getting lucky - having it then only convert down to 4x the bonus amount. and then playing on because the conversion amount might be to small to consider withdrawing, and many might continue to try and increase the converted amount, or ultimately bust.. rather than withdraw a small amount. something some might not consider on a slightly higher conversion.
was thinking it might help in contributing towards that colossal amount of yearly playthrough over multiple sites.

 

[Harry_BKK]

Erm... I'm not defending Nektan, in any way shape or form. I don't play at their sites. I was merely pointing out to that poster that Nektan aren't the tin-pot company that most people think they are.

Risk assessment is about what they could comfortably afford to pay out. So of course it's connected to cashflow.
I'm not saying VS are under-funded, but they're maybe not as well-funded as some would think

You only need look at that thread about how VS tried to split a 'Divine Fortune' jackpot up in to seperate payments, and then had to backtrack and stump up the whole amount, because it was a UK player.
Although withdrawals of >50k, may still be delayed upto 30 days, to be paid in full.
Do they still have a maximum withdrawal limit (for no-UK players) in place?

Also any sites I've looked at the max bet at, have been in real play. The majority are at £9 and the bigger sites (Unibet MrGreen etc) are at £18. So I would expect a conscious decision has been made by those sites, when choosing the stake

In business, reducing risk exposure has nothing or very little to do with cash flow. It is the amount you want to risk being liable for and does not necessarily reflect where your cash flow is. A business or a casino can be very profitable and sitting on a huge pile of cash, yet minimises risks where possible. I would call that a smart move.

Plus, Videoslots is in general a casino geared towards low and medium rollers. The vast majority probably never bets higher than a buck or two, which is perfectly OK.

 

[dave1888]

Anyone who's annoyed about the bet size limit is very greedy if you ask me , is a max potential of over £360,000 not enough?

 

[Harry_BKK]

Anyone who's annoyed about the bet size limit is very greedy if you ask me , is a max potential of over £360,000 not enough?

All Blueprint games have a $250K cap and I don't see many complaining about it, yet VS limiting the exposure on DOA2 to $360,000 seems to be a problem for some.

 

[brianmon]

All Blueprint games have a $250K cap and I don't see many complaining about it, yet VS limiting the exposure on DOA2 to $360,000 seems to be a problem for some.

Just an observation not a complaint

 

[jjqj1982]

some guy posted 44000x on diff forum

 

[SlotGrinder]

How long will it be before someone posts on Casinomeister winning £100k+ on DoA at a Nektan or Jumpman gaming site with little hope of ever seeing a penny

Am surprised how VideoSlots have dropped the max bet several times in just 48 hours!

Nektan are bad ?

 

[chiya]

Because Netent cannot restrict 3 bet sizes from one coin value and two from the next coin value.

E.g. they can adjust to 2 bet sizes across all coin values but not different from coin to coin.

Can't restrict or don't want to restrict? As far as programming goes, allowing the max level to vary depending on the coin value would be very easy to do.

 

[Harry_BKK]

Can't restrict or don't want to restrict? As far as programming goes, allowing the max level to vary depending on the coin value would be very easy to do.

You don't know how easy or difficult it would be. Or are you privy to Netent's code? Easy to make assumptions.

 

[JohnSnow]

Holy crap what a nice win. I never play less than 90p and made at least 3k spins on this game and was very very sad with the results. Then again I have never ever in my life got a nice win on doa 1 or jack and the beanstalk.

 

[polli123]

Amazing hit, biggest i have ever seen on a DoA slot.

 

[dunover]

Just to let you all know - @subsoil PM'd me to tell me Videoslots got Netent to video the spin in question and sent me the file as unluckily he didn't film it. I've converted it and uploaded it so I can embed it here. Fair play to VS and Netent, nice gesture.

Enjoy!

(Courtesy of @subsoil )

 

[kaatra]

Hi Guys,

i hope you dont mind that i open a new Topic for that ... but i guess this deserves it.
Im a long time DoA fan and in all the years, my biggest win was ~4700x i guess. Today i played DoA2 for the first time and guess what? Two amazing Wildlines with the "hardest" Bonuspick. Unfortunately, i didnt made a screen from the first one, but it was round about 6600x. (With the 4 Scatter curse )

And now, this Beauty saved the Day. Shame that im such a low roller ^^
View attachment 107992

amazing