Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Recent Forum Threads
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
Recent News
And it's now limited to £3.60 max bet at VideoSlotsAfter this win, VS will probably limit it to 90p
And it's now limited to £3.60 max bet at VideoSlots
And that's even though it's only showing an 'actual' RTP of 85%
View attachment 108102
imagine our rage as the final 11 spins returned sweet FA
The wife had a few pence from an old bust out in her Casumo account and fluked the bonus earlier.
Advising her to pick the low volatility one to at least possibly secure her some play time (and maybe a cash out so I can do the battle weekend ) imagine our shock when she easily triggered the extra 5 spins and eventually peaked at a whopping 23x multiplier
Also imagine our rage as the final 11 spins returned sweet FA
The reason why they changed it again is because some CM members and probably players in other forums asked to have more bet sizes at the lower end.
They launched it with just one coin - 0.09, 0.18, 0.45, 0.90, 1.80 and 4.50, one bet size for each coin value.
After the change you have now: 0.09 + 0.18, 0.18 + 0.36, 0.45 + 0.90, 0.90 + 1.80 and 1.80 + 3.60, two bet sizes for each coin value.
Going up to the 0.50 coin value after the change would have meant that they allow bets of up to $9 which they didn't want as they released it with a $4.50 limit. And Netent can't offer to block the second coin just for one value, so they had no other choice but to drop the 0.50 coin entirely.
To be honest, I would limit it too as the slot turns out to be as predicted quite the beast. Paying out over 5k on a measly 18 cents bet is pretty much unheard of.
The reason why they changed it again is because some CM members and probably players in other forums asked to have more bet sizes at the lower end.
They launched it with just one coin - 0.09, 0.18, 0.45, 0.90, 1.80 and 4.50, one bet size for each coin value.
After the change you have now: 0.09 + 0.18, 0.18 + 0.36, 0.45 + 0.90, 0.90 + 1.80 and 1.80 + 3.60, two bet sizes for each coin value.
Going up to the 0.50 coin value after the change would have meant that they allow bets of up to $9 which they didn't want as they released it with a $4.50 limit. And Netent can't offer to block the second coin just for one value, so they had no other choice but to drop the 0.50 coin entirely.
To be honest, I would limit it too as the slot turns out to be as predicted quite the beast. Paying out over 5k on a measly 18 cents bet is pretty much unheard of.
Haha I’mHow long will it be before someone posts on Casinomeister winning £100k+ on DoA at a Nektan or Jumpman gaming site with little hope of ever seeing a penny
Am surprised how VideoSlots have dropped the max bet several times in just 48 hours!
Nektan might be tight with their bonuses and such like.Haha I’m
Surprised Nektan or jumpman even have doa 2
They are the only site AFAIK who have limited it so low though, and It was a hit that may well never be repeated.
I'd say it's more a reflection of VS's cashflow than anything else.
Especially as they've currently got a house-edge of 15% on it
The wife had a few pence from an old bust out in her Casumo account and fluked the bonus earlier.
Advising her to pick the low volatility one to at least possibly secure her some play time (and maybe a cash out so I can do the battle weekend ) imagine our shock when she easily triggered the extra 5 spins and eventually peaked at a whopping 23x multiplier
Also imagine our rage as the final 11 spins returned sweet FA
But why is it just VS liming the slot? I just played DoA2 at a casino where the max bet was 18€ . Image 30k x bet on a 18€ bet .. rip casino.
Also the coin values make no sense. Why limit the lower end too? I understand limiting max bet but it literally makes no sense, that you can't play this game at 0.27 or 0.72 for example.
They are the only site AFAIK who have limited it so low though, and It was a hit that may well never be repeated.
I'd say it's more a reflection of VS's cashflow than anything else.
Especially as they've currently got a house-edge of 15% on it