1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Cryptologic

Discussion in 'Casinomeister's Poker Room' started by shjcard, Aug 25, 2008.

    Aug 25, 2008
  1. shjcard

    shjcard Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Cardiff, UK
    I have been playing the above via William Hill and Littlewoods. Of all the sites I play, I have never seen so many pocket bullets go down. Not mine but others. Crypto is the one to avoid methinks.
     
  2. Aug 25, 2008
  3. Alexishot69

    Alexishot69 Banned User

    Occupation:
    computing
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    have to agree

    Probably one of the worst poker networks for bad beats and there used to be a sites called totalbet and ukbetting that used cryptologic and there was a uk tv programme calle dpoker night live that brought up the subject one night of collussion and crypto was said to be uninterested in such claims even though they knew it was going on..
     
  4. Aug 25, 2008
  5. guesswest

    guesswest Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    xxx
    Location:
    Malta
    If you see more bad beats on Crypto (or anywhere) it means either:

    A: The RNG is rigged, which would be extremely serious if true, but is almost certainly not true, as asides from it being a certainty that any network that size will have their RNG periodically tested by a third party, it's also public information which anyone can test with a big enough hand sample.

    Or

    B: More suckouts happen because a greater number of players get their money in bad, ie there are a lot of fish on Crypto - in which case it is a GREAT site to play at, not a bad one.
     
  6. Aug 25, 2008
  7. pokeraddict

    pokeraddict Webmaster

    Occupation:
    Pro Poker Player
    Location:
    Las Vegas

    It's C, variance. Crypto is neither rigged nor fish filled. Of all non US sites it is probably the tightest due to all the nitty bonus/rakeback grinders.
     
  8. Aug 26, 2008
  9. guesswest

    guesswest Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    xxx
    Location:
    Malta
    Yes, or variance. I agree Crypto players are generally quite tight, but they don't really offer better rakeback than other networks. I think the main reason is actually a disproportionately high number of UK players as compared to other networks. A sweeping generalization here but I'll stand by it - UK players are typically nits.
     

Share This Page