Mack, two things give it away in this case:
- According to the OP, he started gambling about a year ago. Exactly the time his "girlfriend" told L&L she has a very bad gambling addiction and they excluded her.
- Jan compared the player profiles of the OP and the "girlfriend". They match. Maybe one day you get a chance to look at the tool they are using for the analysis, it is very, very rarely wrong.
Sorry, but there is little doubt left what is happening here.
So in effect the gf never gambled but by self excluding herself it gives the joint card some refund protection against the gambling losses the op might run up?
Or the gf was addicted, and self excluded but then wanted to carry on gambling so got the boyfriend to sign up to new casinos, where she could then play under the guise that it was him?