1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Suggestion Comments on Warnings

Discussion in 'Forum Suggestions, Announcements, & Feedback' started by maxd, Nov 10, 2015.

?

Should we add something so that readers can comment on Casinomeister Warnings?

  1. Nope, don't need it.

    14 vote(s)
    30.4%
  2. Yes, let me comment in the Warning thread itself (could get messy!)

    5 vote(s)
    10.9%
  3. Yes, give me a link to a thread where I can comment.

    21 vote(s)
    45.7%
  4. Not sure, might be nice but I typically wouldn't bother.

    6 vote(s)
    13.0%
    Nov 10, 2015
  1. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
    As it happens I'm passing this along on behalf of a couple people who've emailed-PM'd me:

    So the suggestion is that forum members should be able to comment on the Warnings. Either directly or via a link to a thread for comments on that Warning.

    I'll add a poll here so we can gather your preferences on this.
     
  2. Nov 10, 2015
  3. MiltonW

    MiltonW Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    I think not via the warning. That should be yours (and Brian) alone. But create a thread automagically. Can't hurt.

    PS. I'm one of these people, because I feel Fenix should be Rogued.
     
    2 people like this.
  4. Nov 10, 2015
  5. Jono777

    Jono777 Meister Member CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    Self- Employeed
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    IM (humble :p) O - Nope

    Casinomeister, above all else know what they are on about and would not administer a warning in the public forum if it was not warranted.

    Allowing members to 'post reply' would, as suggested open a can of worms, it could give novices, members associated with said casino chance to 'argue' back and even possibly spread total BS.

    The warnings are clear as glass and spell out truthful instances, whether members decide to heed them or not is up to them, CM has then played its (important) part by originally offering the warning!
     
  6. Nov 10, 2015
  7. MiltonW

    MiltonW Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Hmm, but I wanted to add to the warning, and I couldn't... I felt the casino (Fenix) should be rogued. Of course I can always start my own thread, but why not just do it automagically...
     
  8. Nov 10, 2015
  9. Jono777

    Jono777 Meister Member CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    Self- Employeed
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    Fair point!

    However do we need more than one warning or reassurance from others that the warning is factual ? ?

    Do we need examples of where players have come unstuck more than the OP ?

    In my opinion No, Casinomeister tells me to avoid a place for a plausible reason with just one example, then I avoid it.
     
  10. Nov 10, 2015
  11. MiltonW

    MiltonW Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    Netherlands

    Yeah, but I felt Warning wasn't enough. I believe it was Spintee who proved that Casino-for-Me and Fenix actually have the same owner, so obviously, the not paying because the previous owner didn't transfer the funds...
    Anyway, Max only sticks to the facts, I believe we should be able to expand on that. Since we can't reply on the warning, why not give us a chance on the public forum (without having to do it ourselves).

    And also, I tried to find Fenix in the reservation/rogued section. Nope. So maybe we need a Warning section?
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. Nov 10, 2015
  13. Jono777

    Jono777 Meister Member CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    Self- Employeed
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    Guess we'll agree to disagree on this one then lol!

    I can see and understand your point however.
     
  14. Nov 10, 2015
  15. osulle

    osulle Ueber Meister CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    life
    Location:
    Northern hemisphere
    I voted for the create a separate thread because as others have stated the casino we are being warned about may be connected to another casino. Also it is possible that one of the affiliates of the rogue casino can have contact information for the casino that might help resolve any problems. Probably pointless but you never know.
     
  16. Nov 10, 2015
  17. MiltonW

    MiltonW Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    How would anyone know not to play Fenix? These warnings aren't registered. So either rogue the casino, create a Warning section, or create a thread, so it's more likely to show up on google... Don't understand why people would disagree.
     
  18. Nov 10, 2015
  19. Jono777

    Jono777 Meister Member CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    Self- Employeed
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    My comments and input were towards max's post at the top, Fenix had not been mentioned at the time of my first post.

    However I was aware as there was a rather lengthy thread about it a few weeks back!
     
  20. Nov 10, 2015
  21. MiltonW

    MiltonW Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Obviously. But the 'Fenix' example clarifies the need for public response. And I believe it should be automatic. Shouldn't be only up to Max and Brian.
     
  22. Nov 10, 2015
  23. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
    ?? Please explain, I think I'm missing what you mean here.

    Should add that the "auto-magical" thing probably isn't trivial. Don't want to create a separate thread for each person that clicks through, etc. Programming issues are going to come into play here I would guess.
     
  24. Nov 10, 2015
  25. MiltonW

    MiltonW Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Can't reply on Warning forum. So I would have to make my own thread. No biggy, but why not help us out to get some feedback.

    Should be trivial. You post a warning, et voila, thread created. But then, I'm an old school programmer, so biased...
     
  26. Nov 10, 2015
  27. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
    I hear you, I'm an old coder myself, but "old style programming" and vBulletin don't have much in common. If there's a facility already in place or a good plug-in available then sure, no problem. But if you have to start thinking about rolling your own then you're poking sticks into a house of cards: shit breaks faster than you can say "wankers!"
     
  28. Nov 10, 2015
  29. dunover

    dunover Unofficial T&C's Editor Staff Member CAG PABnononaccred PABnonaccred PABinit mm3 webmeister

    Occupation:
    International Money Launderer
    Location:
    the bus shelter, opposite GCHQ Benhall
    I voted 'not needed'. Obviously on some occasions warnings go up directly as a result of CM members' complaints in public (i.e. the recent G*l* one) and F*n*x which we have seen in detail anyway.

    Other funny stuff we often aren't party to; it may come as a result of a discreet PAB or be an affiliate matter or simply reliable info picked up by Max, Bryan, Simmo or Webczas and then posted in a warning thread. In that case the integrity and information in the closed thread is sufficient for us anyway IMO. They always take the trouble to explain WHY in detail anyway.

    If Bryan or Max post a warning 'Shagnasty Slots are a bunch of Wankers because.....' I don't really see the need for us to all add comments which basically add up to: 'yeah, you're right Max, they really ARE wankers!'
     
    2 people like this.
  30. Nov 10, 2015
  31. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    I definitely would like members to have to opportunity to comment. It could be some of us have some information which Bryan or Max might not have, which could effect the status of the warning... in EITHER direction!

    I do agree though that a separate thread would be better, allowing only Max or Bryan themselves to make any necessary additional comments to the main Warning Thread based on what members post, if they see fit.

    So I voted for option 3.

    KK
     
    3 people like this.
  32. Nov 10, 2015
  33. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
    Or, often likely, "no!!!!!!! you suck!!!!!!!! Casino Butt-Scratch is ThE bEsT cAsInO!!!!!! I -heart-symbol- it!!!!!!". Just sayin'. ;)
     
    1 person likes this.
  34. Nov 10, 2015
  35. dunover

    dunover Unofficial T&C's Editor Staff Member CAG PABnononaccred PABnonaccred PABinit mm3 webmeister

    Occupation:
    International Money Launderer
    Location:
    the bus shelter, opposite GCHQ Benhall
    LOL.....has the Casino4life 'rep' been back by any chance???:D:D:D:D:D
     
  36. Nov 11, 2015
  37. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    Yes he has. He was wondering where I got my information from. :rolleyes:

    As for the Warning threads, I've kept it closed for posting so that is doesn't get cluttered with high fives and rebuttals. I think a good compromise is to open a "comments" thread when a warning appears. This can be done by the person making the warning - or even by a concerned member. I try to post the warnings in the rogue section - time permitting. And of course if it's well deserved, an actual listing in the rogue pit. As you can tell, I've been quite busy the past few weeks. :D
     
  38. Nov 11, 2015
  39. jjezebel37

    jjezebel37 Meister Member mm1

    Occupation:
    sales/marketing
    Location:
    Belfast (Northern Ireland)
    I voted no need.

    I trust casinomeister enough to not go near the rogues.
     
    2 people like this.

Share This Page