1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Colin Cowherd in underqualified to be on TV 3 hrs. Agree?

Discussion in 'Sports Talk' started by coloradobuff, Sep 1, 2010.

    Sep 1, 2010
  1. coloradobuff

    coloradobuff Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Sports Writer
    Location:
    Denver, Colorado
    We deserve better than having to have Colin Cowherd on TV for 3 hours a day. Sure the guy is opinionated on alot of issues, but you can tell he really doesnt follow sports that closely.

    Cowherd doesnt deserve to be on tv no more than one hour.

    What we need on ESPN is a more nuts and bolts type person who really follows sports. Would like to see scott van pelt or doug gottlieb get more airtime on ESPN.

    What you think?
     

Share This Page