1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Cinema Casino Dont pay!

Discussion in 'Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues' started by susanjbo, Sep 18, 2007.

    Sep 18, 2007
  1. susanjbo

    susanjbo Moderated User

    Occupation:
    wife
    Location:
    australia
    I looked for a accredited casino on this site, as i normaly do. I signed up to Cinema Casino and made a deposit, thinking i would receive my 100% match bonus. After spending more than 500 EURO or aprox $832 australian dollars i then requested information regarding my bonus. The operator was very nice and informed me that i was not eligable because i didnt use a currency assosiated with my region!//

    Well to my surprise i asked " how do you determine what currency belongs to what region?" I was told that we in australia belong to the US currency and no bonus's now or in the future would be paid to me. I thus reqeusted information
    where i could find these rules in there terms and conditions. I was met with silence. Since last night i see they have now added then so im told.


    My responce was swift, rang my bank and placed a stop on my card.,..... I used a rule i never knew i had. Australian residents are not permitted to play online, so my bank tells me. All in all this would never have happend should they have honoured there bonus, Now i dont care. They can keep there bonus, ill be spending my returned funds once they are procssed elsewhere.

    My bank informs me that if they process the transactions they may face criminal charges. Now thats a better system, about time our aussie pollys got there act together. To bad we are not allowed to play.
     
  2. Sep 18, 2007
  3. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Well, it'll teach casinos not to take the p**s with players by trying to tell them which of the FOREIGN currencies they are supposed to play in while not having this information available to them when they deposit.
    In global terms, the Euro and the US Dollar are equal in rank; however, the US Dollar can be a difficult currency to use while playing online because it is an American currency, and this can lead to transaction problems even for non US players - surely then it would be natural for international players whose currency is not available to select the Euro. If you had gone for the UK Pound the casino might have a point, but not for the Euro.

    As for Australians not being allowed to play online, true, but few know about this. Hypocritical of the Aussie government to allow Lasseters and co to attract players from outside Australia based on the strict government regulation, yet clearly the Australian government do not think the regulation enough to protect it's own citizens.
    I doubt the Australian government will do too much about enforcing this unless it conflicts with domestic betting outfits, lest they suffer the same problems as the US have with the WTO

    Having done this "chargeback" though, you have to consider online gambling over for yourself, as you may well be on a risky player database.
     
  4. Sep 19, 2007
  5. VPL

    VPL Casino Representative

    Occupation:
    Call Centre Manager
    Location:
    South Africa
    Bonus issues...

    Dear Susan,

    The following paragraph has always been in our terms and conditions. It is point 28 to be exact. It is also stated in the casino terms and conditions, that by downloading and installing the casino, a player agrees to abide by all terms and conditions. The download and installation process has a check box (I agree to all terms and conditions), that needs to be ticked before being allow to proceed further with it. Furthermore, the currency issue is an eCOGRA and FATF (Financial Action Task Force) requirement. Below, I have pasted the terms and conditions relevant to your situation.

    Point 28 (casino terms and conditions)
    Players must play in the currency of the country in which they reside if it is available. If the home currency is not available players must play in US Dollars. Should players not observe this rule their bonuses will be removed.

    Point 1 (Casino terms and conditions)
    Player fully understands, agrees to, becomes a party to and shall abide by all rules, regulations, terms and conditions contained herein and as such rules; regulations, terms and conditions may change from time-to-time.

    You also stated that it is illegal to gamble online in Australia. Our terms state the following:

    Point 26 (casino terms and conditions)
    Our terms also clearly state that it is up to the player to understand the laws or their jurisdiction, which may prohibit them from playing online.

    Point 4 (casino terms and conditions)
    The activities and games of the casino are open only to residents of those jurisdictions where such participation is legal and not prohibited. Player acknowledges that it is their sole responsibility to understand laws in their jurisdiction, which may prohibit participation of the online casino facility. Such laws may disqualify players from participating and nullify eligibility.

    Point 9 (casino terms and conditions)
    By placing real wagers, the player warrants that he/she is legally able to do so within his/her jurisdiction and that he/she accepts that we are unable to provide any warranties as to their legality or otherwise of their participation in real money play.

    We hope that your questions have been successfully answered.

    Regards,

    Curt,

    Cinema Casino
    Vegas Partner Lounge
     
  6. Sep 19, 2007
  7. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Since you now know it is illegal for Australians to gamble online, they should be automatically barred from registering, just as the large majority of casinos now bar Americans after the passing of UIGEA.

    I am not sure I believe this bit about the US Dollar being an eCogra issue, it would seem odd given that the US are determined to stamp out online gambling, and one way has been to make it hard for their Dollar to be used as a gambling currency.
    Many players not from the US have had problems with transactions, and have been told the problems were due to them having used the US Dollar, and American banks have to act as a conduit for transactions involving the Dollar. Of course, this might be a bulls*** excuse rather than real problems with the dollar.

    I suspect that it being "term 28" indicates it is buried in the small print, which many players just glance at because it is often written in "legalese" rather than plain English. Such an important issue should be prominent at registration, not left to players to find it at clause 28. This player probably thought it had been added because of how deep down this clause was in the list of terms.

    This has unfortunately created a situation where Australian players now know they can effectively "charge back" losses because the banks are afraid of criminal proceedings should the player complain about the bank NOT reclaiming the funds. This could be used to their advantage, and would effectively be the players' version of confiscation of winnings and return of deposit that casinos are increasingly fond of.

    While the player is expected to read the terms, the casino is equally responsible to keep abreast of mainstream international rules about online gambling. There is more than enough publicity around the fact that Australians are NOT supposed to engage in online gambling, but casinos seem to ignore such rules when it suits them. Even now, American players are being offered ways round the UIGEA, despite it being illegal to transfer gambling monies between a US Citizen and an offshore gambling portal.

    Are you the same outfit that told a TURKISH player they should have used the Euro, not the US Dollar? Your terms would indicate this Turkish player was correct in using the US Dollar, and whatever casino he played at should have honoured his winnings without a fuss.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. Sep 19, 2007
  9. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    Not to derail, but quickly inform; it is not illegal for US residents (except certain states) to play at online casinos (no need to give a casino the excuse not to pay!) and it is not illegal to transfer gambling monies between a US Citizen and an offshore gambling portal. This is a false supposition I see again and again.
    The UIGEA states specifically that it neither changes, adds to nor modifies any existing law, it is only a tool to enforce existing internet gambling laws, i.e. toothless and ludicrous. The processor and transactors have over-reacted.

    /derail
     
  10. Sep 19, 2007
  11. winbig

    winbig Keep winning this amount. webby PABnononaccred

    Occupation:
    Bum
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Playing devil's advocate here, but had you won, this thread wouldn't exist.
     
  12. Sep 19, 2007
  13. GrandMaster

    GrandMaster Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Mathematician by day, online gambler by night.
    Location:
    UK
    Could you quote either the ecogra or FATF requirement? I think you just made it up.
     
  14. Sep 19, 2007
  15. SlotsWizard

    SlotsWizard Dormant account webmeister

    Occupation:
    I currently work for the Wizard of Odds
    Location:
    North of Antarctica
    Unfortunately, a quick check of the Wayback archive confirms that this term has been there for at least a few months. Whether or not it's a "good" or fair term is another story.

    A more interesting (but slightly off-topic) question is, why does Australia's government license Australia-based online casinos (i.e. AusVegas) but at the same time not allow Aussies to gamble online? Isn't that a bit of a double-standard, similar to the US situation?
     
  16. Sep 19, 2007
  17. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    This is worthy of investigation. if this is found to be bulls***, then we have a rep lying to the forum. If true, one has to wonder what criteria make the US Dollar the "international" currency as opposed to any of the other currencies used in international exchange, such as the Euro, or indeed the Japanese Yen.
    Also, if this IS indeed a requirement under eCogra or FATF, WHY is it ONLY a "requirement" when bonuses are involved, yet it seems VPL was happy to allow an "illegal" currency if no bonuses were used. Does this mean it is OK for a seal holder to ignore FATF and eCogra if they just don't give out bonuses?
    I just don't buy it.
     
  18. Sep 19, 2007
  19. GrandMaster

    GrandMaster Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Mathematician by day, online gambler by night.
    Location:
    UK
    It is a way to reduce domestic problems while still making money out of gambling.

    Maltese casinos have (or at least had) a minimum age of 18 for foreigners, 25 for Maltese citizens.
     
    1 person likes this.
  20. Sep 20, 2007
  21. phynqster

    phynqster Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    los angeles, ca
    In Costa Rica it is ilegal to gamble on line, but I believe the reason for that is that there are B&M casinos that are revenue generators in Costa Rica so they don't wont a competition for the gambling dollar. Or they just don't wont there citizens to get ripped off by a Costarican bussiness.
     
  22. Sep 20, 2007
  23. winbig

    winbig Keep winning this amount. webby PABnononaccred

    Occupation:
    Bum
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    And the $64,000,000 questions for the VPL rep are:

    a) Had this person not pursued a bonus and just simply lost on all of their deposit(s), would the casino be proactive and notify the user, letting them know that their account is in violation of the casino's T&C and then refund their deposit(s)?

    or

    b) If this user had won, would their winnings be void, or simply converted to USD instead of EURO?
     
  24. Sep 21, 2007
  25. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    They would have acted on the first withdrawal, they would surely then have to sort out the fact they had violated this eCogra and FATF rule, and could have required the account to be converted to Dollars.
    What is intersting is WHY are disallowed currencies offered in the first place, this is the LAST field on the fourth page of the registration form. Since the player is required to register the COUNTRY as part of the address, even without automated security checks on IP and details, the field "Australia" could have been fed into the programming behind the presentation of the last page, and only allowed the Dollar to be requested. Other MG casinos can do this, so why not this one, same software isn't it:rolleyes:

    Far better to have as foolproof a system as possible, rather than have a player walk into traps through ignorance of how the industry works.

    This matter was certainly serious enough for the casino to throw out a loyal returning player who was still willing to deposit more in the belief that it would all work out OK in the end. This is as far away from "bonus abuser" as you can get. A bonus seeker would not have wagered a cent until the bonus was sorted, and would have withdrawn the deposit at the first sign of trouble.

    In the end, it all worked out OK, the player simply got what is always given to a player who breaches the terms whether by design or ignorance, their deposit refunded & account locked. No lasting problem then.
     
  26. Sep 21, 2007
  27. BigSD

    BigSD Dormant account PABnononaccred3

    Occupation:
    Accountant
    Location:
    Australia
    Australians online

    There is very likely to be a change of Government in the next couple of months so hopefully soon it will be legal to gamble online. I'm guessing these rules have never been enforced apart from the questionable acts of the person who started this thread.

    MCCE.
     
  28. Sep 21, 2007
  29. chuchu59

    chuchu59 gambling addict CAG PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    EXECUTIVE
    Location:
    SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
    This is just so messy. Ok, the player did not get a bonus YET but seemed to have taken advantage of the situation to put a halt to the payment to the casino. Susanbo said that the bank told her that the casino could face criminal charges if they tried to process the transaction. Then where is the accountability here? Surely the player should be responsible for initiating the transaction as well. Didnt the bank tell her that?

    On the casino's side, I honestly cannot see why they could not credit the player with a bonus that was equivalent in USD terms to the deposit by the player. Sure, she played in Euros but the right thing would be giving her a bonus of say USD 500 for a deposit of 500 Euros. Just a simple conversion should do the trick although she could be getting quite a lot less now due to the strength of the Euro nowadays against the dollar.
     
  30. Sep 21, 2007
  31. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I suspect the player was scared by what the bank said. Australia does not seem to be enforcing the law EXCEPT where there is damage to local outfits. They DID go for offshore sportsbooks offering odds on Australian horse racing.
    This player was clearly NOT the standard "bonus abuser", and would probably have been loyal to the casino. When the casino seemed to "cheat" her out of something they freely advertised as available for all I expect she felt she had been conned. When the bank overreacted by mentioning criminal charges, I don't expect she made a fuss when the bank offered to recover the deposits. Maybe she didn't even have a choice, since in ignorance she made it clear to the bank what the debits were for, and it was the BANK that told her it was an illegal activity. I expect a US bank would do the same if a customer asked about charges that related to online gambling.

    Naturally, this matter has pretty much put an end to online gambling for this player, as she is now considered "high risk", as her bank will most likely take similar action with any other charges related to online gambling.

    Australia could well find there stance "inconvenient" with it's WTO compensation claim against the USA, while Australia are doing the exact same with THEIR domestic horse racing interests.
    By claiming compensation through the WTO, Australia will be expected to play by the rules they are saying America are breaking. If America's big land casinos get into online gambling, they will certainly be marketing globally, and will pursue Australia if they find they are excluded from the Australian domestic market while Australia's own horse racing interests are allowed to operate.

    I still want to see evidence that there really IS this FATF and eCogra requirement for Australians to use the US Dollar - so far it seems this is being selectively enforced against players that want to participate in promotions. International banking regulations do NOT differentiate between cases of deposit bonuses and "plain vanilla" casino gambling - I expect the casino made this rule up themselves, and are misusing eCogra and FATF to make it look like they were FORCED into this draconian action and did not make it though choice.
    If this IS anything to do with eCogra, it will be in the eGAP document, and eCogra can be asked for an explanation. There is no international reason for this rule, as citizens in most countries are free to buy currencies other than their own, and use them in commerce - this is essentially what is happening when an Australian deposits in Euros (or US Dollars) from their Australian bank account.
     
  32. Sep 21, 2007
  33. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Tradesman
    Location:
    USA
    If the casino did make up these FATF and eCogra 'policies' they need to come back and apologize/explain, or see the darkness of the pit, imo.
     
  34. Oct 16, 2007
  35. susanjbo

    susanjbo Moderated User

    Occupation:
    wife
    Location:
    australia
    I refer to your email recieved by the Australian Communciations and Media AUthority (ACMA) on 25 September 2007 about online gambling.

    ACMAs role
    ACMA administers a mechanism that allows people present in Australia to make written complaints about access to prohibited internet gambling content under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA).

    Prohibited internet gambling content is internet content that can be accessed, or is available for access, by customers of a prohibited internet gambling service. A prohibited internet gambling service is a gambling service provided, in the course of carrying on a business, to customers using an internet carriage service, and an individual physically present in Australia is capable of becoming a customer of the service.

    Broadly speaking, the IGA relates to the provider of an online service and makes it an offence for a person residing in Australia to be able to place a bet on a game of chance. The IGA does not target the person accessing the site, however there may be other state based legislation that does and you may wish to check with the relevant state gaming board or authority for advice relating to other legislation.

    The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 also makes it an offence to publish or broadcast in Australia an advertisement for a prohibited interactive gambling service under Part 7A. The prohibition extends to all forms of media, both electronic and non-electronic, including advertising via the Internet, broadcast services, print media, billboards and hoardings, subject to certain exceptions. ACMA does not have administrative responsibility for the receipt and investigation of complaints about possible breaches of the advertising prohibition. To report possible breaches of the advertising prohibition, or to enquire about online gambling policy, contact the Department of Communications, Information, Technology and the Arts. For contact details go to You must register/login in order to see the link..

    For more information about ACMAs role go to www.acma.gov.au/ACMAINTER.131352:STANDARD::pc=PC_90135.

    For more information about online gambling policy go to You must register/login in order to see the link..

    Your questions regarding the liability of your financial institution processing transactions related to online gambling are issues best discussed with the Department of Communciations, Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA) whose contact details can be found at You must register/login in order to see the link..

    I hope this information has been of assistance to you.

    Yours faithfully

    K.Eulenstein
    Content Assessment Section
    Australian Communications and Media Authority.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    My question is to you,

    1) Am i at all liable in any way for breaching the gaming act, ?
    2) Is the bank warrented in allowing the processing of any transactions , even after they have been informed that it may constitute a breach of the gaming act.
    3) Am i in my rights to dispute such activitys
    4) And what roll does your organisation play regarding the enforcement of such legislation , If any
    5) Who actually enforces this legislation as its become apparent no one has heard of it.
    What rights have i regarding the use of this media and what responsibilities do banking institutions hold regarding the authorisation of such payments?

    Below is a copy of the federal gaming act 2001


    This article addresses the following issues:

    1. Is it legal for an individual in Australia to participate in online gambling?
    2. Are online gambling services prohibited in Australia at the Federal level?
    3. Are online gambling services prohibited in Australia at the State
    and Territory level?
    4. Is the advertising of online gambling services allowed in Australia?
    5. Is there a complaint system in place allowing the public to lodge a
    complaint against the provision of online gambling services?

    I. Is it legal for you to gamble online?

    The short answer to Issue 1 is yes in most cases. The federal
    legislation prohibiting online gambling in Australia targets the
    suppliers of prohibited gambling services, not the customers of the
    services.

    However, you also need to consider any applicable state law. For
    example, if you are in Queensland or the ACT you will be breaching the
    law if you knowingly participate in unauthorised gaming (ie gaming
    services that the supplier is not licensed to provide).

    II. Are online gambling services prohibited in Australia at the federal level?

    The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) (Federal Act) targets the
    providers (not the actual or potential customers) of interactive
    gambling services: it is an offence to provide interactive gambling
    services to a customer physically present in Australia, irrespective
    of whether the customer is an Australian or not.(1)

    The offence applies to both local and foreign interactive gambling
    services providers. However from a practical perspective, only those
    foreign interactive gambling providers that have a connection to
    Australia are likely to be prosecuted.

    The maximum penalty for the offence is $220,000 per day for an
    individual (2) and $1.1 million per day for a body corporate. (3)

    What are "interactive gambling services"?

    "Interactive gambling services" are defined by the Federal Act as
    "gambling services" provided, in the course of carrying on a business,
    using:

    * an internet carriage service;
    * any other carriage service which has at least one point in Australia; (4)
    * a broadcasting service;
    * another content service; or
    * a datacasting service. (5)

    In turn, "gambling services" are broadly defined as:

    * A service for making bets or introducing individuals to other
    individuals who wish to make bets; or
    * A service for the conduct of a lottery or for the supply of lottery tickets; or
    * A service for the conduct of a gamewhich is played for anything of
    value and which involves an element of chance (games predominantly of
    skill, such as computer games, fall outside the definition of
    gambling services and are not prohibited (6)); or
    * any gambling service (within the ordinary meaning of that
    expression) that does not fall into any of the above categories. (7)

    However, express exemptions exist for: (8)

    * A telephone betting service.

    * A service for online wagering - for example, on a horse race, a
    harness race, a greyhound race, on an event or a series of events or
    (provided bets are accepted only before commencement) on a sporting
    event.

    * A public gaming service (that is, specific gaming services provided
    in licensed pubs, clubs or casinos including linked poker machines in
    clubs). (9)

    * A gambling service associated with a particular broadcasting or
    datacasting program, or where its sole purpose is to promote goods or
    services that are advertised on a broadcast service. (10) Examples are
    interactive TV game shows and promotions with entry fees in the form
    of a 1900 telephone number.

    * Online lotteries and online sale of lottery tickets (but not online
    scratch or instant lotteries). (11)

    * Contracts that are financial products within the meaning of Chapter
    7 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) . This includes contracts for
    options, futures and agreements entered into on a futures market or a
    futures exchange.

    * Exempt services as determined by the Minister. (12)

    Australian customers

    The interactive gambling service provider would not have committed an
    offence under the Federal Act if it did not know and could not, with
    reasonable diligence, have ascertained that its service had Australian
    customers. (13)

    For more details on what is prohibited under the Federal Act, see the
    Online Gambling Facts Sheet .

    The various state and territory regimes are discussed in the last
    section of this article.

    III. Is there a formal process under which I can make a complaint
    about online gambling services?

    The answer to this question is yes. You can make a complaint to the
    Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA) under the Federal Act where
    there is reason for you to believe that end-users of an internet
    service carriage service can access prohibited interactive gambling
    content in Australia. (14) You can do this through the ABAs online
    complaints form.

    The complaint must:

    * identify the internet content;
    * set out how to access the internet content, for example a URL or a password;
    * identity the country where the content is hosted, if it is known;
    * set out your reasons for believing the internet content is
    prohibited internet gambling content; and
    * set out any other information the ABA requires.

    You can also make a complaint about an ISP that breaches the Code. The
    ABA may issue the ISP with a direction to comply with the Code. (15)
    If the breach continues, the ABA may direct the ISP to implement
    procedures designed to ensure that future breaches do not occur. (16)

    If your complaint is made in good faith, you will receive immunity
    from any civil action arising against you as a result of the
    complaint. (17)

    Investigation of complaints by the ABA

    After the ABA receives a bona fide complaint, it will take the
    following courses of action:

    Internet content hosted in Australia

    If the internet content is hosted in Australia and the ABA considers
    that the complaint should be referred to an Australian police force,
    it must do so and advise the complainant of this in writing. (18)

    Internet content hosted outside Australia

    If the internet content is hosted outside Australia, and the ABA
    believes that the content needs to be referred to either a domestic or
    a foreign law enforcement agency, it must contact a member of an
    Australian police force. (19)

    The ABA must also notify the ISP industry of the prohibited gambling
    internet content in accordance with the designated notification scheme
    specified in the Interactive Gambling Industry Code 2001 .

    Interactive Gambling Industry Code 2001 (Code)

    The Code was developed by the Internet Industry Association and was
    registered by the ABA on 13 December 2001. Essentially the Code sets
    out the designated notification scheme under which the ABA is to
    notify the industry of prohibited gambling content, and the procedures
    the industry should follow in dealing with the relevant content. More
    specifically:

    * the ABA is to directly notify (by email or otherwise) the Suppliers
    of Scheduled Filters (being those filters listed in Schedule 1 of the
    Code) of the prohibited internet gambling content and is to regularly
    email ISPs notifying them of the content;

    * upon receiving notification from the ABA, the suppliers are to
    up-date the filters so as to block access to the relevant content. In
    turn, the ISPs are, as soon as reasonably practicable and at a charge
    determined by the ISP, to offer their subscribers an up-to-date filter
    that prevents access to the relevant content. The filters can be
    provided through online registration or a notification, with links to
    effect download activation and instructions for use. There is no
    obligation on people to buy or use these filters. In addition, if the
    internet subscriber already has an effective means of preventing
    access to the prohibited sites, the ISPs do not have to offer a
    filter.

    Compliance with the Code is voluntary unless the ABA directs an ISP to
    comply with the Code. (20) Non-compliance with a direction results in
    a maximum penalty of $5,500 for individuals and $27,500 for
    corporations, with an additional 10% for every day the offence
    continues. (21)

    The ABA may also apply to the Federal Court for an order that the ISP
    cease supplying the relevant internet carriage service. (22)

    IV. Is the advertising of interactive gambling services allowed in Australia?

    The answer to this question is no. The Federal Act prohibits the
    broadcasting, datacasting and publishing of advertisements for
    interactive gambling services in Australia. (23) An example of
    publishing an advertisement in Australia would be to place it on a
    website which is aimed at Australian end-users. (24)

    For more details on the advertising offences and the defences to them,
    see the Online Gambling Facts Sheet .

    V. Are online gambling services prohibited in Australia at the State
    and Territory level?

    The Federal Act expressly allows for the concurrent operation of state
    and territory legislation to the extent that it does not conflict with
    the federal legislation. (25) Both the Federal Act and the relevant
    state or territory legislation need to be examined for the applicable
    laws on an issue. It is important to be aware that:

    * If a service/activity is exempted under the Federal Act, it may not
    necessarily be exempt under a state or territory law; and

    * A service/activity may be prohibited under the Federal Act even if
    it is licensed or authorised under a state or territory law.

    In light of the Federal Act, state or territory specific internet
    gaming legislation continues to be of significance but primarily only
    in so far as it regulates the licensing of Australian-based
    interactive gaming providers in the provision of interactive gambling
    services of-shore. In addition, certain state acts create an offence
    of participating in online gambling.

    Please be aware that the following discussion on State or Territory
    legislation is subject to the above legislative limitations and
    uncertainties.

    Specific online gambling legislation in the ACT, Queensland and Victoria

    Prohibition on unauthorised interactive gambling

    Generally, you must not participate in, encourage or facilitate
    another to participate in an interactive game if you know that the
    game is not an authorised game. (26)

    What interactive games are regulated?

    An interactive game in which:

    * Potential exists for winning a prize consisting of money or value
    through the rules of the game;

    * Players participate by means of a telecommunications device and
    make a payment to participate in the game; and

    * A winner of a prize may be decided by chance or skill;

    are regulated under legislation of these states.

    Interactive games which are not regulated Generally, the legislation
    does not apply to racing and betting games authorised under other
    Queensland, Victorian or ACT gaming legislation.

    Authority to conduct a particular interactive game

    The Minister may give an authorisation to a licensed Service Provider
    (SP) to conduct a particular interactive game. SPs must comply with a
    number of legislative requirements (eg withholding gaming services
    from minors and nominated problem gamblers). These requirements are
    discussed in more detail in the Online Gambling Fact Sheet.

    Northern Territory and Tasmania

    In both states, existing gaming legislation has been amended to
    regulate internet gaming. However, the legislation does not create an
    offence of participating in unauthorised gaming.

    New South Wales, South Australia and Western Australia

    New South Wales, South Australia and Western Australia have not
    enacted specific legislation on internet gambling. The existing
    legislative regimes in these States contain prohibitions which apply
    in general terms to prohibit operators from providing or promoting
    interactive gambling services to residents in those States.

    Despite the lack of specific legislation, certain operators in those
    States have been granted licences to carry on interactive sports
    betting and wagering services on the internet. (27)

    Other relevant Articles on this site: Terms and conditions of website
    Overseas transactions
    Tax

    Other relevant Fact Sheets on this site:
    Jurisdiction
    Online Gambling
    Taxation
    End Notes: =1. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 15.
    2. This is aimed at directors and chief executives of companies,
    Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth), s 15.
    3. Under subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) if a body
    corporate is convicted of an offence against a Commonwealth law, the
    Court may impose a penalty of up to 5 times the amount of the maximum
    penalty that could be imposed on a natural person.
    4. Telecommunications Act, s 16.
    5. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 5.
    6. Interactive Gambling Bill 2001 Revised Explanatory Memorandum, page 14.
    7. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 4.
    8. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 5(3).
    9. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 8B. Specific gaming services are
    those for the conduct of a game, where:
    * the game is played for money or anything else of value; and
    * the game is a game of chance or of mixed chance and skill; and
    * a customer of the service gives or agrees to give consideration to
    play or enter the game. (sub section 5(e))
    10. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 8C.
    11. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 8D.
    12. Interactive Gambling Act, s 10.
    13. Interactive Gambling Act, s 15(3).
    14. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 16. The complainant must be an
    Australian resident or a company carrying on activities in Australia:
    Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 19.
    15. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 42.
    16. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 56.
    17. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 23.
    18. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 20.
    19. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 24.
    20. Interactive Gambling Industry Code, para 4.
    21. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, ss 55 and 57.
    22. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 59.
    23. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, ss 61DA and 61EA.
    24. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 61EA(3).
    25. Interactive Gambling Act 2001, s 69.
    26 Interactive Gambling (Player Protection) Act 1998 (Qld) s 16;
    Interactive Gambling (Player Protection) Act 1999 (Vic), s 9;
    Interactive Gambling Act 1998 (ACT) .
    27. Unlawful Gambling Act 1998 (NSW) ; Lottery and Gaming Act 1936
    (SA); Gaming and Betting (Contracts and Securities) Act 1985 (WA)
     
  36. Oct 17, 2007
  37. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    The casino is in breach if they could "reasonably know" they were allowing Australians to participate. If you selected "Australia" when asked for place of residence, this satisfies the requirement (the fact that the casino did not USE the information does not let it off the hook).

    Since participation was illegal from the point of registration, ALL bets would be illegal, whether won or lost. Casinos could use this to void winnings of Australian players just as easily as Australian players can effect a chargeback through their banks.
    If the casino has "special rules" for Australians, they have shown that they both knew, AND ACTED on the information that the end user was Austalian, and they would find it very hard to defend any legal action.

    None of this matters to the casino if they are offshore, as to have any effect there must be a part of the casino, or a member of management, available within Australian Juristiction. This is how the US has handled it's own prohibition, targeting execs who wander onto US soil, as well as strangling the flow of funds.

    I doubt anything will come of a complaint, especially with the potential for a change of government. Casinos will continue to accept Australian players until they judge the risks to their operation are too high, as has now happened with the US market.

    With reference to the original complaint, it seems the casino is wanting to dictate HOW Australian players may "help the casino break the law", by telling them which foreign currency they must use to make their illegal gambling transactions.
     

Share This Page