1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Casinos with Worthwhile Signup Bonuses

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by aka23, Jun 13, 2006.

    Jun 13, 2006
  1. aka23

    aka23 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technical
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    Most sign up bonuses are a waste of time. The terms and conditions favor the house, or the amount of time invested is not worth the benefit. However, some sign up bonuses are definitely worthwhile. My top 5 are below:

    1. Golden Palace -- 350% bonus (extra 50% via live rep) for $100 deposit. $9,000 playthrough (450x20). I gained more than statistically expected.

    2. Bet365 -- $200 for $200 deposit. $4000 (400x10) playthrough. I gained more than statistically expected.

    3. 888.com --- $220 for $200 deposit. $4400 (220x20) playthrough. I gained far more than statistically expected.

    4? Starluck -- $100 for $100 deposit. $1600 (200x8) playthough. I busted at an almost statiscally impossible rate. It makes me think they are using cheating software, but others seem to recommend them. I wonder if this relates to their high affaliate payment.

    5. Casino.net -- $200 for $800 deposit. $10,000 (1000x10) playthough. The single deck game odds give the player a slight edge over the house, unlike other casinos. The game quality was higher and support was good. I gained far more than statistically expected.

    What others are out there?
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. Jun 13, 2006
  3. CasinoForumu

    CasinoForumu Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    Bursa
    Planetluck ,willhill, ladbrokes,harrods,private,redlounge,,all their waqering req. is less than 10 x
     
  4. Jun 13, 2006
  5. GI Joe

    GI Joe Webmeister webmeister

    Occupation:
    manager
    Location:
    LA
    Here are my list:

    VC Casino 250/250/5.000 - you must play BJ - Chartwell software - slow but fair

    EuroBet 50/50/800 - BJ okay - you must use an affiliate link to get to the right landing page + 25 match each month - Chartwell Software

    Coral.co.uk - 100/100/2.500 - you must use an affiliate link to get to the right landing page + you can get a 25 free each month - chartwell software

    LittleWoods - 50/50/1.250 - ok cryptologic

    PeachCasino - 200$/1000$/6000$ - ok cryptologic

    RoxyPalace - 100$/100$x9 - no BJ


    GI Joe
    all the You must register/login in order to see the link.
     
  6. Jun 13, 2006
  7. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Dunno about Planetluck (dodgy software?), but agree with the others! :thumbsup:

    Note that Ladbrokes have suspended their SUB for this month :mad:
    Hopefully will be back next month - it's the best on the net! :D
     
  8. Jun 13, 2006
  9. BingoT

    BingoT Nurses love to give shots webmeister

    Occupation:
    Nursing & Run Bus Trips
    Location:
    Hartford,Ct
    I will say 32Red,Starluck,Planetluck

    I will say 32Red,Starluck,Planetluck
    You hear bad stuff about all of them. I say they are all bad
    You are their to make money not on what the place looks like lol
    But over all (1) Planetluck,(2) 32Red,(3) Starluck is the order I like them.
     
  10. Jun 13, 2006
  11. Macgyver

    Macgyver Dormant account PABnononaccred

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Here we go again ... :rolleyes:

    Losing at 1 out of 5 casinos does not make it rigged!! Neither does casting aspersions on the integrity of people who may promote them or had a good run at that particular casino.
     
  12. Jun 13, 2006
  13. AussieDave

    AussieDave Dodgy whacko backstabber

    Occupation:
    Gaming SEO Specialist & Casino Webmaster
    Location:
    Australia

    :thumbsup: exactly.
     
  14. Jun 13, 2006
  15. aka23

    aka23 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technical
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    I didn't say just busting. It was the speed of busting based on betting size. There was less than a 1% chance of this happening randomly, according to the tables at casinoexploit.
     
  16. Jun 13, 2006
  17. Oebro

    Oebro Dormant account

    Occupation:
    well...it sucks!
    Location:
    Nowhere
    1 % chance is a lot. This will happen to 1 in 20 people playing at 5 casinos each. Welcome to the world of randomness.
     
  18. Jun 13, 2006
  19. aka23

    aka23 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technical
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    And it happens to more than 1 in 20 people, if the SW is not truly random. Considering the number of issues that have been reported with Starluck SW, either SW or randomness may explain the result.
     
  20. Jun 13, 2006
  21. Macgyver

    Macgyver Dormant account PABnononaccred

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    North Carolina
    And what were the percentage chances of you winning "more than statistically expected" or "far more than statistically expected" at those other four casinos?

    Didn't figure that out, I guess ...
     
  22. Jun 13, 2006
  23. aka23

    aka23 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technical
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    I didn't care enough to work out exact numbers, but a basic summary is:

    "More than statiscally expected" -- within 1 standard deviation above mean

    "Far more than statiscally expected" --between 1 and 2 standard deviations above mean (closer to two with the 2 casinos I listed)
     

Share This Page