Just wondering peoples thoughts are on accredited casinos being allowed to have and invoke the FU rule. This rule basically states "even if you have not broke any conditions we have the right to not pay you if we so desire rule".
I 100% think that this rule should not be allowed at any accredited casino. If they dont put enough thought or care into writing their terms and conditions to exclude actions they don't want and they duely suffer because if it, it is nobodies fault but their own. In such cases they should suffer the loss instead of this spineless act of retrospective denial that has been shown in both the giant vegas and vegas affiliate complaint threads.
What are other forum members views on this? Should this rule be tolerated? Is there any circumstance where it is acceptable? Who will join me in my campaign to rid this scurge of the online casino world?
viva la revoulution (if it takes off!)
I 100% think that this rule should not be allowed at any accredited casino. If they dont put enough thought or care into writing their terms and conditions to exclude actions they don't want and they duely suffer because if it, it is nobodies fault but their own. In such cases they should suffer the loss instead of this spineless act of retrospective denial that has been shown in both the giant vegas and vegas affiliate complaint threads.
What are other forum members views on this? Should this rule be tolerated? Is there any circumstance where it is acceptable? Who will join me in my campaign to rid this scurge of the online casino world?
viva la revoulution (if it takes off!)