Seventh777
RIP Roy
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2010
Maybe I am not asking it right....What I see here is the chance at a free $50 and it costs $1500 to get the said $50. Ok, where is the logic here?? Not many casinos give no max cashouts anymore, it seems, so what is the point of this?
If I took my initial $100 (like Seventh777) and caught a few hundred....that would satisfy me a lot. But to take the additional $50 for ????? A $1500 dollar playthrough???....um..hello....if I was anywhere close to $1500 I sure wouldn't want it attached to a bonus...it makes no sense at all...because to me it seems the casinos object is for you to play BACK thousands for a mere pittance that was offered (your small bonus) when you could have had those THOUSANDS in your pocket if you chose not to be locked into a useless pittance of a bonus...JMO...
What am I missing here??? Those thousand that you are required to play back could be in your pocket.....but yet, you have to spend it for taking $50 ??? I really am missing something for this seems truly very unbalanced to me....almost like a suckers game....JMO...
.
Well, do the maths, I had a wagering of around £3600 and a balance of just under 1100 that`s £4700, the bonus WR was 1500, I would not have started at £3 a spin without that bonus, plus TSII gets considerably better the more achievements you acquire, so any extra cash to chop away at those achievements is beyond helpful.
As seen by my screenshots the largest hit I had was over £500, so are you saying that without a deposit bonus I could have collected that?, instead of carrying on and bypassing the WR with a healthy profit of just under £1000, like I have stated many times - In the past WR were never ever an issue with MG bonuses, so why not take them?.
P.S.
It`s a nigh on guaranteed WR if you do the maths and work out the RTP of around 98%.
Last edited: