vinylweatherman
You type well loads
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2004
- Location
- United Kingdom
Oh Dear!
I signed up and was so Royally Screwed by Jacks or Better I never even made the 5x WR!! I had not heard about the latest change, I certainly didn't see 100% up to $1000 on first deposit. This would still be a decent deal though at 40x Blackjack (50% weights). Sadly, I have made my first deposit under the old rules, and my second and third would be under the new ones, but despite having the harsher WR of the new rules, I can not have the benefit of the bigger bonuses. If the terms are to be retrospective, surely the better bonus should be offered retrospectively to earlier customers.
Uninstalling Mansion is really easy, delete the .lnk shortcut.
The old terms offered $100 + $100 at 5x WR, are the new ones seriously $1000 + $1000 at 20x WR (50% tables and VP). I can see Mansion having to change these terms again amid more uproar, or is there something about their Blackjack/VP that enables the casino to still win overall from signups?
I signed up and was so Royally Screwed by Jacks or Better I never even made the 5x WR!! I had not heard about the latest change, I certainly didn't see 100% up to $1000 on first deposit. This would still be a decent deal though at 40x Blackjack (50% weights). Sadly, I have made my first deposit under the old rules, and my second and third would be under the new ones, but despite having the harsher WR of the new rules, I can not have the benefit of the bigger bonuses. If the terms are to be retrospective, surely the better bonus should be offered retrospectively to earlier customers.
Uninstalling Mansion is really easy, delete the .lnk shortcut.
The old terms offered $100 + $100 at 5x WR, are the new ones seriously $1000 + $1000 at 20x WR (50% tables and VP). I can see Mansion having to change these terms again amid more uproar, or is there something about their Blackjack/VP that enables the casino to still win overall from signups?