# Blackjack - I lost 38 hands in a row

#### casinos

##### Newbie member
I have proof of losing 38 hands in a row on first person blackjack and live blackjack on Pub Casino *snip*

I am in disbelief I know gambling can be risky but this is so wrong and I have never experiencend anything like this playing online for many years.. losing this amount of hands in a row is mathematically impossible

Last edited by a moderator:
If you keep hitting until you go bust and don't manage to get a BJ or 21 in that time, I'm quite sure it's possible to lose 38 hands in a row

I played basic strategy aslways My point is this shit is rigged its all corrupt

The odds of losing 38 hands in a row is over 1 trillion to 1. Blackjack online is rigged no doubt. RNG or live. I used to play RNG and regularly get 20 losses on the spin which is in the at least 200000/1 category. These events don't match the maths of probability.

Blackjack can be a brutal game, especially with computer blackjack I find it can be super streaky. Maybe take a break from the game for awhile, casinos house edge makes them more than enough without having to ring their games.

No chance of losing 38 BJ hands in a row using basic strategy, simply too remote to happen. If you genuinely did, then the place is running bent software 100%.

Post up the proof of losing 38 hands in a row OP - then this thread might turn into something interesting

Post up the proof of losing 38 hands in a row OP - then this thread might turn into something interesting
I Will when My timeout expires tomorrow
I believe this casino is using Bent software

No chance of losing 38 BJ hands in a row using basic strategy, simply too remote to happen. If you genuinely did, then the place is running bent software 100%.
Yes i believe this casino is is using false software i have played for yesrs
I Will be posting My Proof tommorow

Out of interest, if losing 38 hands in a row is an impossibility, what's the most anyone has ever lost in a row?

I have proof of losing 38 hands in a row on first person blackjack and live blackjack on Pub Casino *snip*

I am in disbelief I know gambling can be risky but this is so wrong and I have never experiencend anything like this playing online for many years.. losing this amount of hands in a row is mathematically impossible

I Will when My timeout expires tomorrow
I believe this casino is using Bent software

You can access gaming history when a timeout is active, you just cant deposit or play.

I played basic strategy aslways My point is this shit is rigged its all corrupt
Oh really? This casino software you are complaining about is not much different than what you'd find offline in a casino or betting shop. It is highly regulated and monitored. It's the same software used by hundreds of UK facing casinos to include William Hill, Betfred, Ladbrokes, and all the high street Ronald McDonald casinos and betting shops.

So if you are the one person out of millions of players that has spotted this rigged software, my hat is off to you. As L&L Jan has stated - post your proof of it being crooked software here in this thread

As for live dealers - well not much software involved there. Did you film this? Or how is this connected?

As for live dealers - well not much software involved there. Did you film this? Or how is this connected?
It is a mix of live and RNG, ive found the session(s)

The main thing is not to get carried away and not beat your own records for losses.
I still wish you good luck!

Out of interest, if losing 38 hands in a row is an impossibility, what's the most anyone has ever lost in a row?
My record is about 14 or 15 (basic strategy).

My record is about 14 or 15 (basic strategy).
If we're counting pushes, about 20. It's why Microgaming computer Blackjack is on my permanent ban list.

I have this before and I believe it explains these issues - people often forget that computer BJ can have a totally different volatility compared to a land-based game where the dealer uses anything from 2-8 packs of cards in the shoe. Online, you can literally have unlimited packs in your virtual shoe and therefore a dramatically different volatility which will inevitably produce unnatural (compared to LB) runs. Like the person above a few posts back mentioned.
I only ever played online BJ once and I instantly thought that what I was seeing was strange, losing streaks that defied 'natural' odds. I never tried it again. Perhaps it's because unlike LB casinos who can spot it, online cannot prevent card counting and the best way to neutraliize this is to have a huge number of packs in the programme/shoe. This would happen to some extent on live dealer too. The card dispenser, who knows how many packs are in it? Would they tell you? No. Can you unravel the virtual BJ programme to find this out? No.

So you are playing the same RTP (probably) as LB BJ but the variance is substantially altered. Hence the BS runs you get. If you are a fan of LB BJ then I wouldn't even bother with online.

Shall I post the proof instead?

What, your breaking silence / NDA's now and coming out with evidence that it's rigged? xD

What, your breaking silence / NDA's now and coming out with evidence that it's rigged? xD
Nope, opposite

anyways there were no 38 hands lost in a row. If I remember correctly I believe the max was 7 hands.

I only ever played online BJ once and I instantly thought that what I was seeing was strange, losing streaks that defied 'natural' odds. I never tried it again. Perhaps it's because unlike LB casinos who can spot it, online cannot prevent card counting and the best way to neutraliize this is to have a huge number of packs in the programme/shoe. This would happen to some extent on live dealer too. The card dispenser, who knows how many packs are in it? Would they tell you? No. Can you unravel the virtual BJ programme to find this out? No.

So you are playing the same RTP (probably) as LB BJ but the variance is substantially altered. Hence the BS runs you get. If you are a fan of LB BJ then I wouldn't even bother with online.

In Live Dealer, the provider keeps the count and compares it with players' betting patterns in real-time. They can quickly determine if someone is manually or using software to keep a count. If they detect it, you might suddenly lose your connection! But the eight-deck shoes with 50% penetration are normally enough to deter most card counters.

eight-deck shoes with 50% penetration
I love it when you talk dirty gambling Neil

eight-deck shoes with 50% penetration
That is disgusting. No, really it is. Cutting a shoe in half is just filthy.

Out of interest, if losing 38 hands in a row is an impossibility, what's the most anyone has ever lost in a row?
Not a particular record but I once lost the first 7 hands of a 6 deck shoe before then winning every remaining hand until the last one before the shoe was due to be changed. Shame as I had £100 on the last hand and would have pulled it/walked with the change of shoe. Turned £70 loss into near £400 profit (bit of positive progressive betting). Winning run must have been up around the 14-15 mark I imagine which is some going.

Question Online blackjack
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
858
Replies
2
Views
549
PAB in progress Novibet Withdrawal
Replies
11
Views
536