- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Location
- Pictland
In September '08 a player racked up about $60,000+ balance at BeTheDealer thanks to a jackpot and some general winnings. The casino immediately invoked their T&Cs, specifically the clause that limits their monthly payouts to the player:
Though less than pleased with this the player accepted it and began to receive their payments. Unfortunately after a couple months the casino arbitrarily decided to scale those monthly payments back to $1000 per month, again per the T&Cs:
This clause in particular is unforgivable since it forces the players to agree that the casino can pay them whatever they feel like paying regardless of how long that may stretch out the payment plan. Why not $100/month? Why not $5? As occurs from time to time we have to reiterate that just because something is written in the T&Cs that does not mean it is reasonable or fair.
Given the size of this player's win and the typical procedure within the industry of setting a reasonable payout schedule -- usually Jackpot wins are paid off in a few installments or via a plan that pays out the balance within a year -- we would have hoped that the casino would offer an "individual payment plan" of more per month, not LESS.
The bottom line is that $2500 a month is ridiculous for a winning of this size, never mind $1000 per month. Common business sense should be followed here, not some lock-step mantra of their T&Cs. We believe they should make an exception and pay the guy in a year, preferably as marked from the first payment in Sept '08.
Warning: BeTheDealer uses Terms & Conditions that may severely limit the rate at which winners will be paid. This means that payment plans can and will stretch out to several years or more. Exceptions will not be granted since the casino takes the hard line of quoting the T&Cs by the letter.
Though less than pleased with this the player accepted it and began to receive their payments. Unfortunately after a couple months the casino arbitrarily decided to scale those monthly payments back to $1000 per month, again per the T&Cs:
This clause in particular is unforgivable since it forces the players to agree that the casino can pay them whatever they feel like paying regardless of how long that may stretch out the payment plan. Why not $100/month? Why not $5? As occurs from time to time we have to reiterate that just because something is written in the T&Cs that does not mean it is reasonable or fair.
Given the size of this player's win and the typical procedure within the industry of setting a reasonable payout schedule -- usually Jackpot wins are paid off in a few installments or via a plan that pays out the balance within a year -- we would have hoped that the casino would offer an "individual payment plan" of more per month, not LESS.
The bottom line is that $2500 a month is ridiculous for a winning of this size, never mind $1000 per month. Common business sense should be followed here, not some lock-step mantra of their T&Cs. We believe they should make an exception and pay the guy in a year, preferably as marked from the first payment in Sept '08.
Warning: BeTheDealer uses Terms & Conditions that may severely limit the rate at which winners will be paid. This means that payment plans can and will stretch out to several years or more. Exceptions will not be granted since the casino takes the hard line of quoting the T&Cs by the letter.
Last edited:
