just seems to be that if the deposit used a 3rd party card and lost then betfair wins and makes no comment and does not refund and likewise use a 3rd party card deposit and win they refund deposit and confiscate losses....
Yup, it is intentionally brutal because it causes headaches for the operator as well - particularly around responsible gambling, self-exclusion and AML. They incur unnecessary costs by doing the investigation, and in some cases
neither party will get the money (in which case it is forfeit to charity).
Genuinely guys every bit of advice and view points I have taken onboard since the beginning and appreciate the time you have all taken to respond...
No worries, sorry it wasn't a better outcome for you.
I'm not sure how it would work if the roles were reversed I would like to think if you asked them they might close the account and refund deposits but I am probably wrong about that.
This is pretty much how the self-exclusion fraud worked, because it only functions correctly if
all transactions can be reversed. Dishonest players are predictably unwilling to comply with such requests, which introduces a freeroll against the casino.
The fraudsters cottoned on to this, and would start mentioning the magical words for accounts that lost, while withdrawing from accounts that won. Annoyingly, that causes a problem for the genuine cases because they now lose out because of the fraudsters.
But the decision to close your account and refund deposits probably wasn't an easy one for betfair for them to do this they are basically saying that if you did take this further and maybe end up taking them to court then they are 100% sure they would win this case. If they thought they would lose I think you might of had a different outcome.
Also the cost of ADR is borne by Betfair, as would their share of any court case - so paying off something that might be a borderline case (because the funds haven't been lost) could be seen as a better business decision than fighting it.
Also, wouldn't be the first wacky rulings we've seen from the courts in recent years... best for them to leave that untested!