asadzareef89
Meister Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2013
- Location
- United Kingdom
Anyone else noticed this warning on Betat UKGC license, I just noticed this yesterday and I'm surprised i haven't read about this on CM(Shocked lol!)
So is this something that should be worrying?
Status: Warning with conditions attached
Decision Date:
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Details:
Remote Casino and Remote Linked Gambling Software operating licences
Following a licence review, the Commission decided that it was appropriate to give NRR Entertainment Limited, trading as BETAT (The Licensee), a warning and impose a condition on its licence under section 117(1)(a) and (b) of the Gambling Act 2005. The reason for this decision was because the Licensee had breached conditions of its licence by failing to submit a security audit and regulatory returns when required, and also by failing to comply with a condition of its licence relating to specified management offices as it had failed to ensure that holders of personal management licenses (PMLs) occupied the specified management offices. The condition attached to the licence requires the Licensee to ensure that the specified management office for its gambling regulatory compliance is occupied by the holder of a PML who does not occupy any of the Licensee’s other specified management offices. In reaching its view, the Commission took account of the action the Licensee had taken to address the Commission’s concerns throughout the review.
So is this something that should be worrying?
Status: Warning with conditions attached
Decision Date:
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Details:
Remote Casino and Remote Linked Gambling Software operating licences
Following a licence review, the Commission decided that it was appropriate to give NRR Entertainment Limited, trading as BETAT (The Licensee), a warning and impose a condition on its licence under section 117(1)(a) and (b) of the Gambling Act 2005. The reason for this decision was because the Licensee had breached conditions of its licence by failing to submit a security audit and regulatory returns when required, and also by failing to comply with a condition of its licence relating to specified management offices as it had failed to ensure that holders of personal management licenses (PMLs) occupied the specified management offices. The condition attached to the licence requires the Licensee to ensure that the specified management office for its gambling regulatory compliance is occupied by the holder of a PML who does not occupy any of the Licensee’s other specified management offices. In reaching its view, the Commission took account of the action the Licensee had taken to address the Commission’s concerns throughout the review.
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.