Anyone got a fake ID that will get my 1yr old into a casino?
I asked on 32red chat just before posting last time, but was told they didn't have an exact answer, I said I'd be sad if 32red pulled out of Australia, and Monika said she hadn't heard anything like that, and in the unlikely event it does happen, we will be informed well in advance. Its not her fault for not having all the facts, and when a law is passed, things change to abide by it asap. But dammit it gave me hope and reassurance. To be honest, I was searching high and low for any thing I could use as a blanket to hide my head under, a false sense of security blanket maybe.
Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezuz fuuuuucking Christ. Fuck shit fuck fuuuuuuuuck. Nooooo :'( Apologies for my language, im sure you understand, its to be expected in situations like this. Another awesome thing for me is I live in Western Australia so my only option is the one venue -crown casino, which as far as I know does not even have a law surrounding its payout % unlike the other states.
I don't know if I'm right, but when I was gambling only at the crown casino I lost maybe 15-30 thousand a year over 5 years (probably even lost more) compared to around 1 thousand a year online.. I had seen myself as a problem gambler, until i started gambling online. I did not spent less time gambling, I just didn't lose all the time.
Is it possible that as online gambling is so much more widely accessible (for single parents, people without establishments nearby, people who maybe drink or have no car or lic as its unsafe and illegal for them to drive to a casino, etc etc, ) that a larger percentage of us do gamble, but responsibly, and amounts that are manageable (spending more as an entire country yes, but lowering the number of problem gamblers)
80% of us gamble, but im damn sure there's not 80% of Australia at the casinos, meaning a lot less percentage of australians are probably losing a lot more. And you could argue about what constitutes a gambling problem, whether its time spent versus the amount of money being spent. There is always 24hrs in a day, if you lose for all of those 24hrs, its going to cost a hell of a lot more and more often than not its losing more than we can afford that defines it being a problem. If you win (even if the end result means you are down) for even a few of those 24hrs you don't spend as much, and are less likely to spend as much as would be problematic. I know it doesn't help the cause, but what are everyone's thoughts on my theory