Since you only need a company name to satisfy the banks, why use Morriyen Investments rather than Synergy, or any other name for that matter. If you are not trying to fool the banks, why not simply have the true owner listed as "owner" on the website? I don't mean their NAMES as individuals, just a holding company set up for the purpose, like Synergy.
Given the nature of the industry, especially the US side, I don't think viewing and reviewing these documents is going to get the results Rome are hoping for. It could in fact make things even WORSE for them, as it could fuel further digging around. I cannot see how anyone could say "innocence proved", as surely the best outcome would be "nothing obviously dodgy found so far".
As for the legal arguments, why are you still banging on about CIVIL action against Affactive. DDoS is a CRIMINAL matter, not a Civil one. This is one for the police, which should quickly deal with the immediate problem. Only THEN do you start preparing a civil claim for damages, adding to it anything that comes out of any criminal actions. If the police got involved, I expect those involved would run for cover, and the DDoS would cease. Other "black hat geeks" would be reluctant to take over whilst knowing that international law enforcement were looking into the matter.