1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Rogue Announcement 888.com and all of its brethren

Discussion in 'Forum Suggestions, Announcements, & Feedback' started by Casinomeister, Aug 31, 2017.

    Aug 31, 2017
  1. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
  2. Aug 31, 2017
  3. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
  4. Aug 31, 2017
  5. conker

    conker Super Moderator CAG MM webmeister

    Occupation:
    Marketer
    Location:
    UK
    Made BBC Radio 4 news today, with a whole section about it. Looks like Sarah Harrison (head of UKGC) is standing up to these firms who have been taking punters for a ride all these years.

    More to come no doubt...
     
  6. Sep 1, 2017
  7. slotsoffun

    slotsoffun Full Member

    Occupation:
    Muso
    Location:
    UK
    The following was taken from the Gambling commissions review - You must register/login in order to see the link.

    I wonder if the individual registered/used a company credit card and if so how it passed verification. Maybe it was cash, but not sure how if online deposits were made - deposite cash into their own bank first maybe. Still, £55k is nothing on the other £1.25 million losses.

    Hmmm, so the employer was reimbursed with extra to likely cover interest/legal costs, fair enough. I wonder if the individual kept his/her job, or did the company recognise the problem and offered occupational health support with an agreed deduction in wages to pay it back. Or was the individual sacked and charged with fraud?

    Also, if 888 are being charged for not detecting the issue, are they part responsible and shouldthey return all/some of the individuals losses? I mean, if an establishment serves alcohol to someone they believe is not physically or mentally stable, they can be liable. I 'think' (so please don't quote the law back to me) it's the same if somebody serves alcohol to someone they know will drive or doesn't make steps to prevent someone from driving if they appear intoxicated.

    Or is it tough luck - the individual knew the risks and continued regardless!
     
  8. Sep 1, 2017
  9. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    It was actually on the 6pm main BBC news tonight - quite a major feature on it.
    Glad the B'stards got what was coming to them! ;)

    KK
     
  10. Sep 1, 2017
  11. Gaz237

    Gaz237 Senior Member MM

    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    chelmsford UK
    Taken from the Guardian article.


    The customer staked more than £1.3m, including £55,000 stolen from their employer, during a 13-month period during which they gambled three to four hours a day, placing more than 850,000 bets – an average of about 2,150 bets every day.

    They were later sentenced to 16 months in prison for theft and false accounting.
     
  12. Sep 1, 2017
  13. slotsoffun

    slotsoffun Full Member

    Occupation:
    Muso
    Location:
    UK
    Oh, thanks. Seems for info was available in a tabloid than the official commisioners report.

    I guess the addiction/problem factor was overruled as the individual made concious efforts to falsify accounts.

    Still, it's gotta shake up the gambling industry. This isn't a drug addict robbing a few quid to buy a £10 hit - this sounds like a professional with a wealthy income / lifestyle who lost, not only 1.25m but everything (career, family, trust etc.) and then they got so desperate they stole £55k to try and get it all back.

    In comparison that's like trying to/hoping to win £1k form £50, £10k from £500 or £100k from £5k. Yes, it's been acheived before by those on a miracle session/streak but commonly impossible. We've all seen the high stake streamers who have £15k wins here and there but it's usually quickly re-wagered.

    What I think and hope will happen is,

    1 - the misleading TV/www adverts showing Jackpot symbols rolling in (usually reel combos that are physically impossible to acheive) will be banned.

    2 - casino's will have to make it clear that they basically hire the slot/games from the provider. They have zero control over the game/outcome/odds etc.

    3 - the game providers/developers will have make it very clear how things work. As in, the outcome of a spin or feature is already pre-determined and that it's simply a case of what outcome was next in line when the player pressed the spin button.

    4 - They'll also need to make it clear if playing at a casino makes a difference in outcome. As in, if I play DOA, am I receving outcomes cached on the Casinos server/version of DOA, or do all casinos request an outcome from the game provider (NetEnt in this case) every time a play spins on the game?

    5 - also, does stake make a diffrence? Does a player on a £5 stake call from a diffrent list of outcomes than a player staking 20p?

    6 - also, do mobile and dektop version call from the same list of outcomes?


    Basically, I think things are going to be made much, much clearer to the public/end user how this 'Randomness' works!
     
    1 person likes this.
  14. Sep 1, 2017
  15. Tirilej

    Tirilej Still a Lady CAG

    Occupation:
    Breathing
    Location:
    Sweden
    I doubt any of that will be much clearer. What will happen though is that you will have to prove where you get your money to deposit from. Especially if you're playing for high amounts.
    If this employee had been asked he would have had a hard time getting away with losing that much.
     
  16. Sep 1, 2017
  17. jetset

    jetset Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Senior Partner, InfoPowa News Service
    Location:
    Earth
    I agree - that level and frequency of action should have raised red flags at 888 in any case.
     
  18. Sep 1, 2017
  19. ReggieMac

    ReggieMac Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Senior Software Developer
    Location:
    UK
    I hope this is just the start of a crackdown on rogue outfits such as 888 but sadly I feel the onus will once again be pushed back onto the player to have to prove the availability and legality of the source of the deposits made rather than the casino being held accountable for not enforcing checks in the first place.

    As we all know, regardless of the token gesture of imposing fines on Casino operations, there is always only one real loser in the gambling industry, the player. :rolleyes:
     
  20. Sep 1, 2017
  21. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    :lolup: More like this type of flag waving: :cheerleader:

    Let's be honest, 888/Cassava don't give a rats-arse where the money is coming from, as long as it keeps rolling in - the more the better!
    Unfortunately that just the culture in their country :(

    KK
     
  22. Sep 1, 2017
  23. Vibroverb

    Vibroverb Experienced Member

    Location:
    Europe
    I agree, I don't think Casinos will make an effort to clear things up for the players, the muddier it is, the more people think they can win a fortune. If anything will be done, it will have to be done by the players. Such a proving where the money came from and making it tougher to withdraw (cause they don't care about preventing money coming in)

    When times get tougher, the Casinos will stick together against the players
     
  24. Sep 6, 2017
  25. Arch Stanton

    Arch Stanton Newbie member

    Location:
    UK
    I think some are far worse than others, but yes, basically all online gambling firms couldn't give a monkey's where the money comes from.

    What is shocking about the 888 case of the woman going to jail, is that she was not challenged about such huge deposits and activity over even a reasonable period of time. Some firms will flag it up after a few days, but this went on for over a year.

    I know some people think it's ultimately down to the player's self restraint, like that hypocritical buffoon McCririck, but gambling addiction is a genuine mental health disorder. Problem gambling can catch anyone regardless of class, sex or intelligence. The addiction to gambling is often in stark contrast to very rational sensible decisions in the rest of the person's life. They can be totally reasonably balanced people who have this one weak link that is a compulsion to gamble until everything is gone. Money, assets, friends, family, self esteem and sometimes eventually respect for the law. Worse still the final loss can even tragically be their will to exist.

    For some gambling is a relatively harmless pass time that doesn't take over their life. If gambling firms can't exist on the proceeds from those punters then they are not a viable business. Their profits should not depend on the blatant exploitation of people with a virtually incurable addiction. How the bosses & share holders sleep at night is beyond me.
     

Share This Page