If a land based casino tried to pull this same bullshit by letting anyone gamble after they put themselves on the casinos self-exclusion list, they'd be put out of business by the gaming control board in their state.
So I guess we should give them a pat on the back for not only opening an account back up that was closed by a
player's request, but for sending them promotions, after the casino re-opened the account, as well? Great marketing?
Does anyone else see the problem with this, or is it just me?
Scenario (hypothetical, random figures
I'm a problem gambler. I've just mortgaged my house for the 3rd time, lost $50,000, and requested from every online casino that my accounts be CLOSED,
permanently.
Low and behold, some time later, I get a promotional email from 32Vegas. I get that itch again, and since I can't help myself, I decide to take them up on their offers, losing another $50,000 that I can't afford. Is it their fault that I deposited and lost the money? Yes, and no.
Of course it's their fault for re-opening the account and sending me bonus offers. It's my fault for not being able to control myself and playing at this CLIP JOINT.
If they were licensed and regulated by any REPUTABLE ORGANIZATION, they would be fined
heavily, no?
After the Absolute Poker bullshit in which Kahnawake gave them a slap on the wrist and a $500K fine (Did the players affected ever get a dime of that? I doubt it.), I wouldn't trust them any further than I could throw them.
So maybe the Meister should remove this casino from the 'rogue' list
You're kidding, right?