1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

32K GBP Not Paid By Epoca Casino

Discussion in 'Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues' started by DannyB, Apr 17, 2014.

    Apr 17, 2014
  1. DannyB

    DannyB Dormant account PABinit

    Occupation:
    A student
    Location:
    London
    I played an ongoing offer back in August 2013, since then the pitch a bitch brought no positive result I am left with no choice but to bring it to the forum , forgive me Max but the casino seems to be careless.

    I made a deposit of 400 ,got a 50% bonus and managed to win 33,825 GBP.

    They paid only 1200 (6 times bonus) saying the max cashout according to the terms is 6 times bonus.

    The term they mentioned was of the welcome bonus and not ongoing.

    Back then the 6 times rule was only related to the welcome bonus and not ongoing bonus.

    I even have a screenshot "where a signup bonus has been granted to you"... and then the max 6 times rule.
     
  2. Apr 17, 2014
  3. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
    Yeah, understood. I'll look this over again but afaicr the max payout Terms did apply to your situation.

    FWIW the last I heard from the casino peeps they were gathering the data to support their case and were going to forward that to me. Never happened afaict.

    I've tried to re-contact the rep who was handling things, alerted him to this thread.
     
    2 people like this.
  4. Apr 17, 2014
  5. DannyB

    DannyB Dormant account PABinit

    Occupation:
    A student
    Location:
    London
    Thank you Max but..... The maximum 6 times can't apply because it says clearly and I have a screenshot "where a signup bonus has been granted to you..."
     
  6. Apr 17, 2014
  7. onkel

    onkel Experienced Member PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    webmaster
    Location:
    Larnaca, Cyprus, Cyprus
    6x bonus is obviously a "scam" in itself - on a 50% bonus that would only allow you to book a win of twice the size of your deposit. Seems more and more casinos just use the bonuses to lock players' deposits in and make sure they're ground to zero (while limiting the amounts players can win if they somehow get lucky)
     
  8. Apr 17, 2014
  9. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
    As I said, it was my understanding that it did apply, but this is all just conjecture until the casino responds in further detail. Still waiting for that.
     
  10. Apr 18, 2014
  11. Jasminebed

    Jasminebed Closer to 100 than Birth

    Occupation:
    Not in workforce
    Location:
    Ontario
    I don't have the details of the player's case, but am I correct in understanding that the SUB limits wins to a max cashout, but the player contends that this was not his SUB? That there is nothing to support it is the same rules for subsequent bonuses?

    I can't quite tell if this PAB is resolved (but not in the player's favour), or it's just ground to a halt due to lack of info?

    I really don't want the OP to comment if it will endanger his PAB.

    I am no fan of deposit bonuses that limit winnings. If a player signed up for a bad bonus and agreed to it, tough luck and thanks for pointing that out to us.

    But if a casino is applying SUB bonus terms to subsequent bonuses without being clear they too are limited, that's rogue IMO.

    My favourite non-accredited casino (some will be good guessers :p) used to have a SUB term that limited first deposits under $250 to 10x first deposit cashout. Honestly it kept me from making a deposit at this casino for a long time, and I didn't cashout from my first deposit, and I knew when I deposited it was a term. There was a pretty generous match to offset it, so I went in eyes wide open. Another forum member did exceed that 10x, and pm'd me about it, because they went back to re-read terms before withdrawing. I said AFAIK that's their rule, so you might as well just play down to it for the comp points. This was by pm, and my best guess on the issue.

    After playing well past the WR on the SUB, my fellow CMer was well over the 10x deposit limit still, but by then the casino got back to him and honoured a withdrawl that was smaller than what is was once the WR was met, but in excess of the 10x. They recognised a genuine player and used some discretion which was wise if not obligatory. As far as I can tell from posts, this CM friend remains a player there.

    If you have not finished investigating Maxd due to the casino dragging its boots providing you proof that the term applied to the player's deposit, a warning should be issued that they are uncooperative.

    If Epoca provides proof this term applies, I'd just say steer clear, you can do better elsewhere.
     
  12. Apr 18, 2014
  13. chuchu59

    chuchu59 gambling addict CAG PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    EXECUTIVE
    Location:
    SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
    Max,

    When was it when they said they gathering facts and will then forward these to you. If its been an inordinate period of time it doesn't bode well for the Riverbelle group who had as I recall used dubious terms to deny winnings in the past.
     
    4 people like this.
  14. Apr 18, 2014
  15. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
    My understanding is that the delays in the case were caused by two things: the casino rep not getting back to me -- until now -- with the supporting data on the case + me not following up on things due to being swamped with other things.

    Anyway, I've just received a packet of stuff from the casino peeps. Hopefully that will answer the primary outstanding question(s) in the PAB and allow that process to conclude. Since this has become a public issue now rather than just a private one I'll update here shortly.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2014
    2 people like this.
  16. Apr 18, 2014
  17. mattsgame

    mattsgame Ueber Meister CAG webmeister

    Occupation:
    Web Master
    Location:
    Clown Town
    This is the term:

    5.7.4 Where a Bonus has been granted to you, subject to you being required to have met all wagering requirements, you will be limited to a maximum withdrawal value of 6 times your first deposit amount and any remaining balance will be forfeited. This clause will only be applied at the discretion of casino management. All progressive wins are exempt from this clause.

    I do not like this one bit tbh.. The OP won 32k and at their discretion only paid the 6x, I wonder if the op won just over the 6x if they would have even battered an eye lid. It also says there on your FIRST deposit amount, I hope that does not count for future deposits x bonuses as this would be completely wrong and if they mean just the first deposit bonus the OP was not playing with that (If we believe the OP's story) and its worded very poorly.

    Will be keeping a close eye on this as I do like the Digimedia group but this term is so wrong in my eyes, it is across a few of their casinos and not just Epoca.

    Andrew when was this term implemented at your casinos? I thought you guys were better than this.
     
    4 people like this.
  18. Apr 18, 2014
  19. osulle

    osulle Ueber Meister CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    life
    Location:
    Northern hemisphere
    This is a terrible term and not clear at all AFAICT; it looks like if you win on a bonus in the future the casino can invoke this clause because it says where a bonus has been granted to you. If they haven't done already they seriously need to change this as it can be viewed as predatory. If I read the term wrong correct me.
     
    2 people like this.
  20. Apr 18, 2014
  21. wigan rl

    wigan rl Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Selfemployed
    Location:
    Wigan
    It's near 7 months down the line and they can't get Max all the stuff 'until' it goes public hmmmmm

    If what the op is saying is true then the full amount should be paid if not then this is classed as rouge in my eyes
     
  22. Apr 19, 2014
  23. DannyB

    DannyB Dormant account PABinit

    Occupation:
    A student
    Location:
    London
    The terms you see now are not the same terms I found back then.

    I took a screenshot right after I figured out the casino make problems.
     
  24. Apr 19, 2014
  25. dunover

    dunover Unofficial T&C's Editor Staff Member CAG PABnononaccred PABnonaccred PABinit mm3 webmeister

    Occupation:
    International Money Launderer
    Location:
    the bus shelter, opposite GCHQ Benhall
    The term as it stands is definitely predatory and rogue. It makes depositing and playing any bonus pointless. Winning will simply cause stress, as in 'what proportion of my winnings will the casino, at their discretion, pay me?' I couldn't play under those terms, and if they were added in reaction to the OP's large win ex post facto, then it is rogue behaviour, effectively unwarranted confiscation of winnings.
    Let's hope that Max gets a quick and effective line of communication with the casino in this case. Taking the OP at his word you'd have to support him in this case.

    I have their terms here from Wayback for spring 2013 before the player had the issue:
    You must register/login in order to see the link.

    Now the term 5.7.4 concerning '6x first deposit max w/d if bonus taken' was added MAY 2013 and prior to this wasn't there as you can see in the above link (NO term 5.7.4)

    So, if the player deposited and this issue was created BEFORE the term was added in May 2013 then he has a valid case. If he joined and took the bonus afterwards, unless the casino has fiddled the date on its 'last updated' header, then he is a victim of valid (but utterly sh!te) T&C's.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2014
    4 people like this.
  26. Apr 19, 2014
  27. chayton

    chayton aka LooHoo CAG PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    Freelance Designer
    Location:
    Edmonton Canada
    At both Jackpot City and River Belle the term says signup bonus

    5.7.4 Where a Sign-Up Bonus has been granted to you, subject to you being required to have met all wagering requirements, you will be limited to a maximum withdrawal value of 6 times your first deposit amount and any remaining balance will be forfeited. This clause will only be applied at the discretion of casino management. All progressive wins are exempt from this clause.
     
  28. Apr 21, 2014
  29. CompleteFailure

    CompleteFailure Newbie member

    Occupation:
    Customs
    Location:
    Hong Kong

    Thanks for this thread!

    I was about to sign up to golden riviera and was going through the ghastly terms. I came across the clause and googled it cause I wasn't exactly sure what they meant. So this means I can only win 6x my deposit? They say it's only applied at the discretion of the casino so it means if I win more, I might get it but I might not. Very odd.

    Where a Sign-Up Bonus has been granted to you, subject to you being required to have met all wagering requirements, you will be limited to a maximum withdrawal value of 6 times your first deposit amount and any remaining balance will be forfeited. This clause will only be applied at the discretion of casino management. All progressive wins are exempt from this clause.

    On another note they have this term:

    Winnings from these accounts will not be paid out more than the amount of the purchases made on the account. We apologize to the customers from the countries detailed below for the inconvenience caused. The countries are from certain parts of South East Asia, Eastern Europe and Southern Africa;

    They don't detail any countries, they only detail regions. Well, I am from one of those regions so what am I to make of it?
     
  30. Apr 21, 2014
  31. PaaskeDenmark

    PaaskeDenmark Always think positive CAG PABnoaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    Clerk with shipping discounts worldwide
    Location:
    UnKnown
    Vegas Partner Lounge is not allowed to accept Players from the following countries: United States of America, Belgium, Denmark, Cypress, France (France Metropolitan, French Guiana, French Polynesia, French South Territories), Greece, Italy (Vatican City), Spain, and South Africa.
     
  32. Apr 21, 2014
  33. CompleteFailure

    CompleteFailure Newbie member

    Occupation:
    Customs
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Yes, they details those below but none of them are from Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe. Only one is from Southern Africa (South Africa) and all the rest are from completely different regions (North America, Western Europe, French Territories) so the clause doesn't logically follow from the preceding one. I assume that clause has nothing to do with the SEA, EE, SA clause above. It's bizarre.
     
  34. Apr 21, 2014
  35. osulle

    osulle Ueber Meister CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    life
    Location:
    Northern hemisphere
    Okay unless I am totally cracking up and read the terms incorrectly Vegas Partner Lounge does not have the 6x max withdraw on a bonus? I checked the terms before I signed up with 777Dragon and have a pending withdrawal from there.
     
  36. Apr 21, 2014
  37. CompleteFailure

    CompleteFailure Newbie member

    Occupation:
    Customs
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Oh, I don't know about 777Dragon. I was looking at Golden Riviera.

    You must register/login in order to see the link.

    Paragraph 4.5

    I've noticed the Microgamming sites seem to just copy their terms from each other or get from the same sources.
     
    1 person likes this.
  38. Apr 21, 2014
  39. osulle

    osulle Ueber Meister CAG mm4 mm1

    Occupation:
    life
    Location:
    Northern hemisphere
    777 Dragon is Vegas Partner Lounge and this term is not in their terms AFAICT. I was worried there for a second because their first deposit bonus is 200% up to 50 so first deposit is $25. I won on the third deposit bonus and deposited more $80 for the 50% because I had more to deposit (another casino paid me). I checked the terms before I deposited to make sure that 6x rule wasn't in there.

    It seems strange that some Vegas Partner Lounge casinos have this stupid term and others don't. It is really a stupid term.
     

Share This Page