“MGA ignored complaint re. live casino games, now with Swiss

[Hector]

Mate, your best way of proving this and being taken seriously is to simply exploit it enrich yourself. If it behaves like an algorithmic cycle, then ride the algorithmic wave and make millions. Complaining that it's not landing on your numbers because it's rigged will always make you come off as a disgruntled gambling addict, just sayin'.

I’ve actually had sessions with significant wins — and that’s exactly what made the pattern stand out. It wasn’t frustration that made me report this, but consistency in behavior that defies probability.
If I were trying to “ride the wave” and profit in silence, I wouldn’t have sent evidence to the Swiss gambling authority (ESBK). But I chose integrity over silence, because if something is manipulating outcomes in a live dealer roulette, it affects all players, not just me.
This isn’t about one unlucky day — it’s about repeatable anomalies that undermine trust in regulation and fair gaming.

 

[Hector]

Mate, your best way of proving this and being taken seriously is to simply exploit it enrich yourself. If it behaves like an algorithmic cycle, then ride the algorithmic wave and make millions. Complaining that it's not landing on your numbers because it's rigged will always make you come off as a disgruntled gambling addict, just sayin'.

But here’s the real problem: It’s because of casual, dismissive replies like yours — assuming every complaint is just another sore loser — that serious irregularities often go ignored. Players get brushed off without even reviewing the evidence.
I chose integrity over silence because this affects more than just me. This isn’t a personal vendetta — it’s a systemic issue. And I have no obligation to “exploit” a flaw in silence when the right thing is to expose it.

 

[xexe]

But here’s the real problem: It’s because of casual, dismissive replies like yours — assuming every complaint is just another sore loser — that serious irregularities often go ignored. Players get brushed off without even reviewing the evidence.
I chose integrity over silence because this affects more than just me. This isn’t a personal vendetta — it’s a systemic issue. And I have no obligation to “exploit” a flaw in silence when the right thing is to expose it.

Right, and I apologize if I came off as dismissive. I understand that in your mind, you genuinely believe the roulette wheels are rigged. And I'm telling you that the only way to really prove this, is to exploit it. I'm not even asking you to do so in "silence", do it loud and clear to demonstrate that they're rigged. The money you would earn would be taken from these (if true) crooks who facilitated rigged wheels *and* you would be able to actually expose them, rather than get brushed off.

 

[Hector]

Right, and I apologize if I came off as dismissive. I understand that in your mind, you genuinely believe the roulette wheels are rigged. And I'm telling you that the only way to really prove this, is to exploit it. I'm not even asking you to do so in "silence", do it loud and clear to demonstrate that they're rigged. The money you would earn would be taken from these (if true) crooks who facilitated rigged wheels *and* you would be able to actually expose them, rather than get brushed off.

I appreciate your clarification and the change in tone — thank you for that.
However, I believe exposing a systemic issue doesn’t require turning it into personal profit. That’s not my goal. I’m not chasing an exploit — I’m raising awareness about a mechanical flaw that shouldn’t exist in a live game. If everyone just tried to “ride the flaw silently,” these issues would never be corrected, and countless players would continue to lose under false premises.
That’s why I chose the transparent route: evidence, analysis, and a report to a neutral authority. I believe that’s what long-term accountability in this industry needs.

If the authorities decide to do nothing, I’ll eventually share the full evidence here — and when that happens, you’ll be the first to see it and realize how serious this really is.

 

[SYPlayer95]

I appreciate your clarification and the change in tone — thank you for that.
However, I believe exposing a systemic issue doesn’t require turning it into personal profit. That’s not my goal. I’m not chasing an exploit — I’m raising awareness about a mechanical flaw that shouldn’t exist in a live game. If everyone just tried to “ride the flaw silently,” these issues would never be corrected, and countless players would continue to lose under false premises.
That’s why I chose the transparent route: evidence, analysis, and a report to a neutral authority. I believe that’s what long-term accountability in this industry needs.

If the authorities decide to do nothing, I’ll eventually share the full evidence here — and when that happens, you’ll be the first to see it and realize how serious this really is.

I'd just share it now. Makes no different in my view.
If you want to show everyone how bent it is, what are you waiting for?

 

[Hector]

I'd just share it now. Makes no different in my view.
If you want to show everyone how bent it is, what are you waiting for?

I understand your curiosity. Just know that if regulators fail to act, I will make the evidence fully public — and you’ll be the first to see it. And once it’s out, there’s no turning back. That’s why timing matters.

 

[mulven]

Just curious, why are all your replies written by chatgpt? Am I witnessing dead internet theory, or are you a real person just using it to translate from a different language or something?

Ha, the em dash gave it away didn't it!

 

[Hector]

Ha, the em dash gave it away didn't it!

Yes, I do use ChatGPT to help translate and write clearly in English — especially for a topic this serious. It’s a tool, just like spellcheck or grammar suggestions. What matters is the evidence, not the punctuation.

 

[Hector]

“At this point, with how visible this thread has become, I’m quite certain someone from the industry or a regulatory body has already seen it. That’s exactly why I’m being methodical — when I decide to release the evidence, it won’t go unnoticed.”

 

[xexe]

Ha, the em dash gave it away didn't it!

Haha, that's definitely a dead giveaway, but the thing that triggered me to even look for them to confirm was the bullet points in one of his comments, which is something that chatgpt does all the time, but would be so overly formal for any human to do in a casual forum posts where commas to separate the items would've sufficed.

I’m raising awareness about a mechanical flaw that shouldn’t exist in a live game. If everyone just tried to “ride the flaw silently,” these issues would never be corrected, and countless players would continue to lose under false premises.

Right, I explicitly said you could do it loudly though. If you genuinely have some sort of ethical concerns about taking money from a casino that utilizes rigged wheels, then you could livestream yourself predicting the numbers as they happen without betting. A pre-recorded where you allege you found patterns is likely going to get dismissed too, although I'm still curious to hear your analysis so I hope you do upload the vids!

 

[Hector]

Haha, that's definitely a dead giveaway, but the thing that triggered me to even look for them to confirm was the bullet points in one of his comments, which is something that chatgpt does all the time, but would be so overly formal for any human to do in a casual forum posts where commas to separate the items would've sufficed.


Right, I explicitly said you could do it loudly though. If you genuinely have some sort of ethical concerns about taking money from a casino that utilizes rigged wheels, then you could livestream yourself predicting the numbers as they happen without betting. A pre-recorded where you allege you found patterns is likely going to get dismissed too, although I'm still curious to hear your analysis so I hope you do upload the vids!

I understand the skepticism — that’s exactly why I’m being methodical. The footage I have already shows repeatable anomalies, and when I decide to publish it, you’ll be the first to see. I’m not trying to convince everyone. I’m trying to hold those responsible accountable. That takes clarity, not haste.

 

[mulven]

Haha, that's definitely a dead giveaway, but the thing that triggered me to even look for them to confirm was the bullet points in one of his comments, which is something that chatgpt does all the time, but would be so overly formal for any human to do in a casual forum posts where commas to separate the items would've sufficed.

Indeed, I eyeroll whenever I see a new forum post complaint that is structured with lots of sections, lots of bold text and lots of bullet points. Once you've seen the style once, its easy to notice when AI has been asked to structure a complaint properly.

It is definitely preferable to the walls of texts that get posted frequently but the AI always tends to give it a grandiose flair and writes about it like its the greatest injustice humanity has ever seen. That element really bothers me. e

 

[Hector]

Indeed, I eyeroll whenever I see a new forum post complaint that is structured with lots of sections, lots of bold text and lots of bullet points. Once you've seen the style once, its easy to notice when AI has been asked to structure a complaint properly.

It is definitely preferable to the walls of texts that get posted frequently but the AI always tends to give it a grandiose flair and writes about it like its the greatest injustice humanity has ever seen. That element really bothers me. e

If a complaint is well-structured and clearly written, the focus should be on its content — not its formatting. I chose to explain things properly because the issue deserves clarity, not noise. You’re free to roll your eyes, but I’ll keep prioritizing substance over style.

 

[goatwack]

I don't see the issue with the implementation of A.I when used for translation purposes, actually showcasing what a useful aid it can be to those not overly versed in another language. It's actually preferable to have that, than trying to decipher the Voynich Manuscript from those struggling to convey their message effectively

Of course if spamming boards with dubious salesmanship and suchlike, the ChatGPT 'posts' become all too apparent with their desperation, and therefore mercilessly mocked, as they should be

This being thematically a smite more 'serious' in nature, I would say "ChatGPT away", as the topic appears to warrant some attention, at least, maybe.

Yet as for attempting to get a straight answer from the MGA - or any other regulatory body - in regards to providers' transparency (or lack therof) or shady findings, I just don't think video snippets are going to get their attention. They'd just claim it's subjective, the footage has been edited, it's not able to be recreated enough to be considered a flaw etc.

They'll simply close ranks and treat you like a pariah, maybe even get children to throw eggs at you in the street. And that's something even A.I can't help you with!

 

[Hector]

I don't see the issue with the implementation of A.I when used for translation purposes, actually showcasing what a useful aid it can be to those not overly versed in another language. It's actually preferable to have that, than trying to decipher the Voynich Manuscript from those struggling to convey their message effectively

Of course if spamming boards with dubious salesmanship and suchlike, the ChatGPT 'posts' become all too apparent with their desperation, and therefore mercilessly mocked, as they should be

This being thematically a smite more 'serious' in nature, I would say "ChatGPT away", as the topic appears to warrant some attention, at least, maybe.

Yet as for attempting to get a straight answer from the MGA - or any other regulatory body - in regards to providers' transparency (or lack therof) or shady findings, I just don't think video snippets are going to get their attention. They'd just claim it's subjective, the footage has been edited, it's not able to be recreated enough to be considered a flaw etc.

They'll simply close ranks and treat you like a pariah, maybe even get children to throw eggs at you in the street. And that's something even A.I can't help you

I appreciate your more balanced take. Yes, I’ve been using AI tools to help communicate more clearly, especially in a language that’s not my native one. The core message, however, is mine — and it reflects serious observations from long hours of gameplay.
I’m fully aware that regulators may dismiss videos as subjective. That’s why I didn’t just send isolated clips — I submitted patterns, timestamped behavior, technical analysis, and contextual data. If that still isn’t enough to raise at least some questions, then the system really is designed to remain closed.
But I believe some eyes will open eventually. Thanks for at least considering the topic seriously.

 

[spindoctor99]

I know this is unrelated but I play live blackjack.. and use to play it a lot years ago. I've often wondered if its rigged just due to the dealers cards. The dealer always seems to get blackjack statistically more than it should. Generally when the dealer has a picture card, the other card is generally a picture card too and its not uncommon for the dealer to go on long winning streaks yet its fucken uncommon for the dealer to go on long losing streaks. I've seen the dealer win more than 20 hands straight.

 

[Hector]

I know this is unrelated but I play live blackjack.. and use to play it a lot years ago. I've often wondered if its rigged just due to the dealers cards. The dealer always seems to get blackjack statistically more than it should. Generally when the dealer has a picture card, the other card is generally a picture card too and its not uncommon for the dealer to go on long winning streaks yet its fucken uncommon for the dealer to go on long losing streaks. I've seen the dealer win more than 20 hands straight.

Thanks for sharing this. It may be a different game, but your experience adds to a broader concern: live dealer games that behave in statistically odd ways. Whether it’s roulette or blackjack, if there’s a consistent imbalance or anomaly, it’s worth talking about. That’s why I opened this thread — to compare patterns and see how far it goes.

 

[spindoctor99]

Pretty conclusive proof of blackjack cheating.

 

[mulven]

If a complaint is well-structured and clearly written, the focus should be on its content — not its formatting. I chose to explain things properly because the issue deserves clarity, not noise. You’re free to roll your eyes, but I’ll keep prioritizing substance over style.

The problem is in most of the AI structured posts I've seen of complex complaints, the verbiage used is over the top sounding like its life and death. It's distracting whilst reading the post.

As I said in my message, I much prefer well structured posts to walls of texts and it is a good thing for people to do who don't speak a language all too well. I was just airing my frustrations with some of the unintended side effects.

 

[Hector]

Pretty conclusive proof of blackjack cheating.

right in his face

 

[xexe]

I know this is unrelated but I play live blackjack.. and use to play it a lot years ago. I've often wondered if its rigged just due to the dealers cards. The dealer always seems to get blackjack statistically more than it should. Generally when the dealer has a picture card, the other card is generally a picture card too and its not uncommon for the dealer to go on long winning streaks yet its fucken uncommon for the dealer to go on long losing streaks. I've seen the dealer win more than 20 hands straight.

How do you suppose they do this, concretely? The video you linked looks more like an innocent mistake dating back 8 years, you can see him wagging his finger up & down before he even takes the card out. How would he possibly know which card comes next? They also literally shuffle the decks right in front of your eyes.

Besides, even if, let's say, their shufflers are all world-class sleight of hand masters who've never slipped up and never spoken out (despite earning modest salaries in eastern Europe) how would they even know the order in which to shuffle the deck? They cannot predict how many people will play or how people will play, so there would be absolutely no way of planning to give the shuffler any card, those cards would, regardless of shuffle, be equally likely to end up in a player's hand.

 

[YouTubeSlots]

Search on youtube for a guy called micky mase, he explains how they rig roulette wheels and blackjack etc in Las Vegas and get away with it.

Yet we're meant to belive they dont practice the same practices online and everything is above board.

Such nonsense If you ask me,

He even explains how the commission in charge of making sure the casinos don't cheat is funded and ran by the casinos themselves.

And that's why they have nothing to worry about. They govern there own law basically

 

[Lemon]

'I lost money gambling online, therefore online gambling is bent.'

'The randomness didn't feel like I imagined it to feel, therefore it isn't random.'

Good luck either way

 

[Hector]

Search on youtube for a guy called micky mase, he explains how they rig roulette wheels and blackjack etc in Las Vegas and get away with it.

Yet we're meant to belive they dont practice the same practices online and everything is above board. Such nonsense

He even explains how the commission in charge of making sure the casinos don't cheat is funded and ran by the casinos themselves.

And that's why they have nothing to worry about. They govern there own law basically

Exactly — that’s why I brought my case to a neutral authority. What I’m reporting isn’t just a suspicion: I have repeated, documented patterns in a live-streamed game with real dealers. If even physical casinos are rigging games, we shouldn’t blindly assume online versions with multiplier mechanics are clean either. Someone has to call it out.”

 

[mulven]

Search on youtube for a guy called micky mase, he explains how they rig roulette wheels and blackjack etc in Las Vegas and get away with it.

Yet we're meant to belive they dont practice the same practices online and everything is above board.

Such nonsense If you ask me,

He even explains how the commission in charge of making sure the casinos don't cheat is funded and ran by the casinos themselves.

And that's why they have nothing to worry about. They govern there own law basically

micky mase is an absolute fraud btw, probably using daddys money for all his claims. He's shown "proof" hes a winning player (at baccarat... without edge sorting) by showing hes up but thats easy to cherry pick