I don't know where this impression came from that admittedly a lot of players seem to have. AG has never been about truth and accuracy. It has thrived for years on shovelling unsuspecting dupes to shitty casinos. I speculate that this was done to increase the chances of them coming back and filling up the complaints section. This perpetuated the cycle and helped the site grow with naive visitors who thought they were being done a favour. The complaints section is littered with unhappy players that are patronised with a big green happy stamp that decides in favour of the casino.. many after the complainant gives up hope of getting their money. It was quite a clever and self serving system that never had player interests at heart.
. This archived page is from 2014 which was long before the site was sold and the casino is rated 6.3 out of 10. So not exactly high praise but read it and you will see there is no warning of anything bad in the text of the review and in fact they are quite complementary. Featured casinos in the sidebar shows Ruby Slots and Palace of Chance - both Virtual Group rogues. Best ranked casinos has Simon's Casino - a crap nickel and dime Rival casino. Obviously this is a geo-targeted list for Americans as the archive.org crawler is likely hosted in the USA but come on these recommendations have clearly been bought.
from around the same time in the featured casinos and the bonuses sections.
which is a rogue that CasinoMeister was warning about for years before that review was published. Scroll down a bit and look. Exactly how many complaints do they need before they decide to rogue a casino? Sheesh.
Or theres
with what looks to me to be a photoshopped google analytics traffic graph.
This impression that it was somehow a great site full of honesty and integrity before it was sold to an evil Swedish corporation is very wrong. As far as I can tell they have hardly changed anything about the site aside from stopping the promotion of casinos that take American players.