Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Yes that Video Poker game IS rigged!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,009
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    437
    Thanked 470 Times in 268 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1429

    Yes that Video Poker game IS rigged!

    This rant moved from here http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/354873-post15.html to avoid further derailment.

    This
    OP
    pasted from above:

    Video Poker games, online and in b&m casinos, are all slots. All slots perform, not only according to how they are programmed by the manufacturer, but how they are played. The player has an active role in play to play performance by making various selections of combinations of lines bet + coins per line. All contribute to the algorithms used by each game to determine how much it is taking in vs how much it is paying out. Since there aren't multiple lines on most video poker games, additional player input is derived by the players choice of coin size, for multi denomination machines or games, the number of total coins bet per hand, usually 1 - 5 coins and the choice of cards held by the player.

    Since programming is written left to right, for video poker, the user interface programing is also led from the left in terms of the five cards held. The dominant card in influencing the cards drawn is positioned on the left of the screen as this is the first instruction in the line of programming by the player which is the 5 cards held or discarded and the remaining 4 cards are weighted with diminishing influence for each of the four places moving left to right. This is why strategy for live cards is useless on video poker.

    I will post the strategy for Jacks or Better single hand video poker that I was taught in B & M casinos which has held 100% true for any Jacks or Better
    VP
    game in casinos or online. I have had over a dozen royal flushes in the last year online and in b&m casinos. The following may not seem to offer the best odds at a royal flush of 4 of a kind in every instance of gameround but the cumulative effect from a series of hands played in the following manner will cultivate royal flushes and 4 of a kinds as well as a higher percentage of lessor winning hands playing Jacks or Better. On Friday I hit a $1 x 5
    RF
    online playing double double bonus poker holding the 10s, As which paid $4,000 and several weeks ago hit a
    RF
    on a
    B&M
    Super Aces quarter machine from holding a single Ah which paid $1,000 on a $0.25 x 5 bet.

    First of all the main strategy is never hold unsuited face cards. If dealt a Jc 2h Qd Ks 9c discard everything but the Jc, the card on the left end of the 5 card array. Leaving the maximum number of slots open for the draw means more opportunities to draw more Js. By holding all 3 of the unsuited faces only 2 slots are open to catch either another J, Q or K and the chances for a four card draw to flush, full house, four of a kind, straight flush or royal flush are eliminated. The exception to this rule is an A in the far right slot when no 10, J, Q or K of the same suit is dealt. In this instance only hold the A dealt to the far right. Otherwise the face card on the left end is always held when all of the faces dealt are unsuited. Additionally, the left slot being dominant, or first in the equation dealt, you will find, over time, that you will draw substantially more Js, as in this instance, than Qs or Ks which were discarded from less dominant slots to the right of the Jh.

    In bonus Jacks or Better games where the As are given prominence in the payout schedules, hold the single A regardless of position. Otherwise, all of these rules apply.

    Only hold two cards of a suit if they are 10 - A and no pair or higher or was dealt.

    Only hold 3 cards of a suit if they will reach to a straight flush. Holding 3 suited cards for a regular flush is not worth the payout in exchange for lost jacks or better hands potentially sacrificed for this practice

    Bet max bet or 5 coins on each consecutive hand if Js or better is the final outcome. If Js or better are not realized, bet one coin on the following hand and immediately revert to 5 coins no matter what the outcome of the 1 coin bet hand was. Continue to alternate between 1 and 5 coins unless Js or better are realized in consecutive hands.

    If, after several gamerounds, Js or better are not realized after alternating for 1 to 5 coins, change coin denominations, if available (as on .05, .10, .25, .50, 1.00, etc
    VP
    games). Raise or lower coin denomination depending on regular, bankroll management practices. If the game is single denomination and Js or better cannot be achieved buy alternating between 1 and 5 coin bets, quit.
    bonus jacks or better this is also true.

    Never hold 3 suited faces in favor of pairs. You can test this by playing in play mode at any site offering play mode and hold 3 cards to a royal while discarding a pair and you will notice the game offer you more and more of the same. I've seen 3/5 hands dealt as a pair + 3 suited faces - every hand a loser if the pairs discarded, over a period of a dozen or two dozen gamerounds. Just like any computer, "garbage in, garbage out."

    On occasion you may be dealt low pairs from 2-6 and 2 suited faces in a long series of consecutive hands. In this case, alternate between holding low pairs and the two suited faces starting from an even money payout from either holding the pairs and drawing trips or holding the suited faces and drawing Js or better.

    If I can think of anythng to add I'll post again.

  2. Thanks love2winalot, rockycatt thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,009
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    437
    Thanked 470 Times in 268 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1429
    I've taken a few screenshots to illustrate the rule in Js or Better
    VP
    of holding only the unsuited facecards dealt to the left end of the five card lineup or the #1 position. These are all in real money mode, a single session, spanning the night of 3/25/2010 and morning of 3/26/2010.

    For simplification, going forward, 10s will be always be included in all references to "facecards".

    The first hand depicts the Qd which occupies the dominant left end position is held while everything else, including the unsuited Kc, are discards. The draw, in this case, conveniently shows that the Kc proved not to be needed.

    The next had is another example of the strength of the card farthest to the left, or #1 position, after the deal. Again since no hand was dealt without any suited faces, the Qc is held as that is the #1 card position while all others to the right, including the Kh, are discards. Upon the draw, once again, the argument that the Kh was never needed at all gains a modicum of credibility.

    The only exception to the only-the-unsuited-facecard-on-the-left-is-held-rule in non bonus versions of Js or Better is if an unsuited A is in the # 5 position, farthest to the right. In this case, all other unsuited faces in positions 1 - 4 are discards. In bonus versions of Js or better, where As are given extra weight in the paytable, unsuited As are held in lieu of all other unsuited facecards no matter the position.

    The sunny outcome of these hands are not to be expected in the earliest hands of a session. These draws are cumulative effect of playing precisely in this manner over not less than one hour at a gameround rate of about 1 hand/8-10 seconds or 6 hands/minute or approximately 360 hands. The cards held, along with the bet denomination, and number of coins bet and total bet amount, combined with the cumulative gameplay within a single session constitutes input by the player resulting in final outcome.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Turn right, then right. then right again
    Posts
    7,690
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    10,070
    Thanked 8,912 Times in 3,482 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 49149
    I would think this would need to be tested properly over a LOT of hands to see if it holds true.

    If this whole 'programming from the left' idea is correct, then you are saying it possible to 'outsmart' the game? Im finding it difficult to accept that any software provider would leave such a simple 'loophole' for a player. Im not saying its not possible, just that Im having trouble accepting the idea.

    When we look at the cards on the draw, we also have to assume that those cards would have been given regardless of what was being held. i.e. When you say the Kh was never needed, how do we know that 2 more Ks wouldnt have been given if, in fact, the
    VP
    game pays like a slot.....maybe it was going to give you 3OAK anyway? Just thinking out loud here
    lol


    Im tempted to try it out, but it would be better to have something statistical to back it up. Saying that one has hit x amount of RFs and x amount of 4AOKs may just be the result of a large number of hands played and may have been experienced if the traditional methods were employed anyway.

    Interesting stuff.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    5,767
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thanks
    12,173
    Thanked 5,207 Times in 2,508 Posts
    Rep Power
    229
    Reputation Points: 32441
    I do know that keeping less than perfect strategy increases the variance, even with a random deck. For most of us, we are not looking to break even over 10's of thousands of hands, but to win over a session of 10's of dozen's of hands, or 10's of hundreds.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,009
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    437
    Thanked 470 Times in 268 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1429
    Quote Originally Posted by Jasminebed View Post
    I do know that keeping less than perfect strategy increases the variance, even with a random deck. For most of us, we are not looking to break even over 10's of thousands of hands, but to win over a session of 10's of dozen's of hands, or 10's of hundreds.
    EXACTLY! Why the first thing to do, if an option, is turn off the auto hold feature because it LOVES holding unsuited facecards! I'm not guaging my success in total hands played, either. Besides, those autoholds and video poker coach programs and tables all work on the assumption of a real deck of cards actually shuffled, randomly, and dealt properly - so it's running on criteria that has nothing to do with any of the instructions programed into these machines!

    BTW I was taught this strategy by a woman I knew from the Spa Casino and Resort in Palm Springs in the early nineties. She she was there a lot with a large group of friends, all very upscale country-club types and every one of them hip to this same set of rules for
    VP
    . Ever since, no matter where, online or off, I haven't found a
    VP
    game that doesn't dictate these same actions. The exceptions are VPs with less than usual paytables, which should just be avoided. But, in the case of Js or Better, as long as the table pays 250,50,25,9,6,4,2,&1 for descending hands from the royal flush to a pair, everything has been consistent for over 20 years.

    I have more screenshots but
    CM
    isn't sizing them and I have to edit the originals.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,009
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    437
    Thanked 470 Times in 268 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1429
    Quote Originally Posted by Nifty29 View Post
    I would think this would need to be tested properly over a LOT of hands to see if it holds true.

    If this whole 'programming from the left' idea is correct, then you are saying it possible to 'outsmart' the game? Im finding it difficult to accept that any software provider would leave such a simple 'loophole' for a player. Im not saying its not possible, just that Im having trouble accepting the idea.

    When we look at the cards on the draw, we also have to assume that those cards would have been given regardless of what was being held. i.e. When you say the Kh was never needed, how do we know that 2 more Ks wouldnt have been given if, in fact, the
    VP
    game pays like a slot.....maybe it was going to give you 3OAK anyway? Just thinking out loud here
    lol


    Im tempted to try it out, but it would be better to have something statistical to back it up. Saying that one has hit x amount of RFs and x amount of 4AOKs may just be the result of a large number of hands played and may have been experienced if the traditional methods were employed anyway.

    Interesting stuff.
    It's been tested by me for over twenty years. The hands pictured are the typical cumulative effect of gameplay as described. VPs not played in this manner penalize the player, meaning there is no cumulative results as I illustrated. Also, if unsuited faces are held, there are that many fewer openings to even make a pair let alone anyting higher. If trying this out, the thing to watch for, and most easily noticed, is how seldom the unsuited discards are re-drawn. As in both examples, you may surprised at how seldom another K is drawn after an original K is discarded in favor of holding the Q, on the left. As long as its a good payable for Jacks or Better, for example, ie, descending from
    RF
    to a pair, 250,50,25,9,6,,4,3,2,1. I've found the results convincingly consistent.

    In answer to your wondering if more Ks wouldn't have been dealt to give me the 3 OAK had I held the K, I don't know. But if they were, why weren't dealt when I held the Q, since by your example I would have played wrong by making the wrong choice? Ad infinitum! It's like heaven and hell. No one is coming back with pics snapped on their cell phone cams.

    Why not try it in fun mode somewhere for an hour and see if you don't notice any difference from what auto hold suggests, for example, or any other strategy you are familiar with.. Then, if you see any merit, get out the slide rule.
    LOL
    .

    I believe that
    RTP
    is
    RTP
    . That one player can achieve a better result than another doesn't change anything. Consider the slot standing in a
    B&M
    casino. That one player can play for an hour and lose an entire bankroll just to have someone else immediately walk up and jackpot on the next pull is a familiar scenario to all of us. Did the second player know any tricks? Not likely as the only user interface possible is the bet size and combinations of lines played and coins per line - hardly anyting that could be applied to slots in general considering the variety of games, lines, symbols, etc. On the other hand we have all been familiarizing ourselves with decks of cards since early childhood. In this case the "slots" in the form of
    VP
    games are decipherable and we quickly form opinions or are easily frustrated with a "dealer" with luck seemingly much too good to be true. When, on the other hand, while no one likes losing to a video or reel slot, we haven't the bias in place to hold much of a grudge as we do when cards are obviously turning against us. We just grip about "tight" slots or some other vague expression whereas we can recount exact hands won and lost in
    VP
    or
    BJ
    because they employ a vocabulary most of us are familiar with.

    Keep in mind, one can't beat the
    RTP
    settings, but one can maximize their slice of the contribution alloted to the overall playtime spent by all players during the RTPs regular cycling. BTW, doubling up after wins voids all warranties.
    LOL

  8. Thanks Nifty29, kakata, rockycatt, retlaw thanked this post
  9. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Turn right, then right. then right again
    Posts
    7,690
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    10,070
    Thanked 8,912 Times in 3,482 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 49149
    Thanks for sharing this Bern - its been a great read!

    I always thought the
    RTP
    was achieved via the payouts for each hand vs the actual odds. It certainly sheds a different light if the
    RTP
    is actually achieved in a more concocted fashion!

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    ˈnɔrweɪ
    Posts
    102
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 102 Times in 32 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 532
    This one is too far fetched for me..

    Do you really think that EVERY
    VP
    -impementation since the early 90s has been done in the same way, with the same "loophole"?

  11. Thanks rockycatt thanked this post
  12. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    On the Beach
    Posts
    774
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks
    194
    Thanked 343 Times in 190 Posts
    Rep Power
    50
    Reputation Points: 1948
    I dont kow if its a software program that deals the hands and have always thought that the cards were randomly generated. However, I know from experience, that in the case of dble bonus where one holds for an outside straight and the hand contains a pair (6 7 6 8 9) ,( 8 9 10 8 j ) for e xample holding the first card generally produces the desired result Of course I have no way of knowing , had I held the inner card if the results would have been the same.

    As to holding the left most unfaced card of a 2 unsuited FC hand, I have watched people doing this but assumed they were just going for the
    RF
    .

    Nothing wrong with this but it sure does magnify the variance I sat behihd a lady once playing $1.00 dble bonus and she threw away every non paying pair to hold the Ace if there was one dealt in the hand She was going for those 4Aces no matter what it costs Think I will try this in dble dble jackpot at 3 dice but will play the 10 cent denom.:-

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,914
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thanks
    2,832
    Thanked 1,598 Times in 873 Posts
    Rep Power
    95
    Reputation Points: 8944
    :thumbs up: i'd like enzo to comment on this

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. New Heads Up Poker video game
    By jetset in forum Casinomeister's Poker Room
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 7th April 2007, 04:42 PM
  2. LOL 3 Card Poker is a Video Poker Game ?
    By Rowan in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14th October 2004, 05:19 AM
  3. Rigged Video Poker
    By f_dupp in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21st August 2003, 04:03 AM
  4. Rigged Video Poker
    By f_dupp in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21st August 2003, 04:02 AM
  5. Rigged Video Poker
    By f_dupp in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21st August 2003, 04:02 AM

Bladwijzers

Bladwijzers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.