You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
A little birdy -- albeit a very well informed and reputable little birdy -- passed these along to me this morning:
re 888:You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
re Bonne Terre:You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
re Casumo:You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
re Ladbrokes:You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Interesting how these days it's always a "rogue affiliate" that is doing the dodgy business, never the parent company who benefits directly therefrom.
Right, it's obvious of the differences here - except Casumo, all of those are big bookies and have huge advertising budgets and far less reliance on affiliates anyway, so can make the calculation that potential fines for rogue affiliate crap in the future far outweigh the revenue/benefits and can thus shut their accounts (which they have) or in the case of Sky simply ditch affiliate programmes altogether, with the added benefit of then retaining 'lifetime' player revenues that would have been paid.
Casumo maybe don't have that luxury and just 'have a chat' with the idiots that do these sick fake news antisocial media ads.
I can only guess the sickest one I ever saw that Bebo spotted about the cancer patient in Canada by Casino Rewards "Oh! it's not an affiliate that did this but a marketing company" (biggest pile of shite I ever heard by the way) and somehow seems to have been quietly forgotten on CM, is not on your links as they don't have a UKGC license?
William is also over £130,000 in debt after having to sell the house and continue to pay out of pocket for his wife’s cancer related medical bills their insurance WOULDN’T cover
Reading those complaints it looks like the same affy or media buyer that posted those ads ...
I was being a little sarcastic. While I could easily accept one or two instances of a "rogue affiliate" producing scummy material it beggars belief that all of these crapulent marketing schemes trace back to affiliates.
As the man said "follow the money and you'll find the bad guys." I certainly know who I think is really behind all this stuff but that isn't going to stop the companies, the media and pretty much everyone else from throwing an "affiliate" under the bus.
But let's get real: does anyone believe this BS? Why is always the same few companies who are always in the shit? Is it because they are innocent and so desperately unfortunate in their business dealings or is there maybe some other, simpler explanation? I'm voting on the latter.
For once I'm not as cynical as you here ...
I was being a little sarcastic. While I could easily accept one or two instances of a "rogue affiliate" producing scummy material it beggars belief that all of these crapulent marketing schemes trace back to affiliates.
As the man said "follow the money and you'll find the bad guys." I certainly know who I think is really behind all this stuff but that isn't going to stop the companies, the media and pretty much everyone else from throwing an "affiliate" under the bus.
But let's get real: does anyone believe this BS? Why is it always the same few companies who are repeatedly in the shit? Is it because they are innocent and so desperately unfortunate in their business dealings or is there maybe some other, simpler explanation? I'm voting on the latter.