Casinomeister is against casinos robbing players by not paying legitimate winnings. Then it stands to reason that Casinomeister is against casinos robbing players by unreasonable T&C.
What is within reason is not a matter of opinion. I don't have a precise definition but I can offer some concrete examples of unreasonable terms:
Terms that are hidden or hard to find. Terms that are impossible or very hard for players to follow.
I can provide further examples as well.
As far as I know, contracts in the real world must be reasonable. I.e.; prenuptial agreements, wills, work contracts, and so forth. If they are not, judges will simply over rule them. It is clear to my mind that online casino's terms and conditions fit into this category as well.
From this page: https://www.casinomeister.com/becoming-accredited/
It says: "Must not implement terms that can be construed as "unfair" towards the player"
Another way of putting it is: Terms and conditions must be reasonable.
Yet, I am under the impression that this standard is not being enforced or that it is somehow being misconstrued. I say this because many people on this forum write "The player broke a T&C so we can't help." When the T&C in question is clearly unreasonable.
And people have been saying for years: "Casinos can implement whatever T&C they want."
So, it's not just a question of; has the player broken a term? It's also a question of; is the term reasonable?
What is within reason is not a matter of opinion. I don't have a precise definition but I can offer some concrete examples of unreasonable terms:
Terms that are hidden or hard to find. Terms that are impossible or very hard for players to follow.
I can provide further examples as well.
As far as I know, contracts in the real world must be reasonable. I.e.; prenuptial agreements, wills, work contracts, and so forth. If they are not, judges will simply over rule them. It is clear to my mind that online casino's terms and conditions fit into this category as well.
From this page: https://www.casinomeister.com/becoming-accredited/
It says: "Must not implement terms that can be construed as "unfair" towards the player"
Another way of putting it is: Terms and conditions must be reasonable.
Yet, I am under the impression that this standard is not being enforced or that it is somehow being misconstrued. I say this because many people on this forum write "The player broke a T&C so we can't help." When the T&C in question is clearly unreasonable.
And people have been saying for years: "Casinos can implement whatever T&C they want."
So, it's not just a question of; has the player broken a term? It's also a question of; is the term reasonable?