RTG doesn't cheat! Hamptons is proof!

aceinhole21

Dormant account
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Location
Canada
Plenty of posters on winneronline have sworn that RTG is rigged (at least before the late shift software came out). Well...if there was a "switch" then obviously Hamptons would have switched it to get out of this mess. So, at least one positive thing out of all of this is that we know RTG blackjack is honest. So if you are looking for an honest place to play that you know pays, I would suggest Inetbet or Phoenician (I haven't played there yet, but the feedback seems good, and they paid the "Pirate" without relying on the bullshi* that now Delanos used not to pay). So why go to a real casino, when you get better odds (and bonuses) online?
 
Using the despicable Pirate situation to promote the very software provider behind the casino in question is in very, very, very poor taste indeed.
 
caruso said:
Using the despicable Pirate situation to promote the very software provider behind the casino in question is in very, very, very poor taste indeed.

:p
Don't be silly. He was expressing his opinion, and it's a valid one. RTG casinos are independent. One bad apple needn't spoil the whole bunch. There are a few very good, reputable RTG casinos, for which I am thankful for because I love the software.
 
I've always liked their software as well, but for a while there, it seemed that none of the casinos using the software were honest. I've read quite a few people talking about Phoenician lately and I may give them a try.

Personally, I have been playing at Crown Vegas lately and have been very happy with them. I love their new super diamond mine game and have been doing quite well at it. They pay me within about 2 business days to my neteller account with no b.s. At one point, I had a bit of a dispute with them over wagering requirements for a promotion. After detailing my position on it in one email, they agreed that there had been an error made and sent me my winnings with no further hassles. I didn't even have to invoke the name of the Casinomeister! That's the way to run a casino.
 
There are several things players should be aware of when playing RTG casinos:

*Read the terms and conditions!

Does the Casino forbid robot play? (Hamptons)
Does the casino reserve the right to retroactively seize previously granted bonuses from pending deposits? (Scifi)
Does the casino limit withdrawals to once per week? (Many)
Does the casino limit the amount that may be withdrawn, so that a large win must be paid in installments? (many)
Does the casino charge for withdrawals (many)
Does the casino have a history of compromising player information and privacy? (Windows)
Does the casino have a history of refusing to supply play history to players? (many)
Does the casino have different rules for Danish players?

Does the casino claim to be licensed? Where?
Does the casino claim to be insured?
Does customer service answer the above two questions?

There is no quality control of RTG casinos. Players must use the "search" function here and on Winneronline.com to find out if a casino is connected to Warran Cloud, has ripped off the entire country of Denmark, or decided to claim on their web site that they hunt bonus "abusers" down.
 
caruso said:
Using the despicable Pirate situation to promote the very software provider behind the casino in question is in very, very, very poor taste indeed.

Didnt mean this to be in poor taste, and if you are implying I am some sort of shill or advocate for RTG, I assure you I am not. I probably should have worded my post a little more respectfully with regards to the Pirate situation, and for that you are right. But my main point is that at least it is known that the RTG software itself is not rigged, either by the software provider or capable of rigging by the licensee. But yes, playing at a second rate RTG (or I should say 95% of RTG's) is a gamble itself as far as getting paid goes.
 
Don't fool yourself. Just because one player got lucky on one version of one game on RTG software does not mean anything. GO AWAY SHILL

aceinhole21 said:
Didnt mean this to be in poor taste, and if you are implying I am some sort of shill or advocate for RTG, I assure you I am not. I probably should have worded my post a little more respectfully with regards to the Pirate situation, and for that you are right. But my main point is that at least it is known that the RTG software itself is not rigged, either by the software provider or capable of rigging by the licensee. But yes, playing at a second rate RTG (or I should say 95% of RTG's) is a gamble itself as far as getting paid goes.
 
I will keep playing rtg casino, long as inetbet casino and phoenican casisno is around. I trust fair play from rtg software, now trusting other rtg casino is a whole differnet thing.
 
Disgruntled said:
Don't fool yourself. Just because one player got lucky on one version of one game on RTG software does not mean anything. GO AWAY SHILL

LMAO! a first time poster calling me a shill. I am no shill idiot. Hamptons did everything possible to avoid paying this guy, including lie, entrap, etc etc (and I get the impression Bryan here doesn't like being lied to). If they could have cheated to win the money back they would have. That was my only point. I am no fan of RTG by any means and support Bryan's policy of not advertising any RTG's until they clean up ship.
 
aceinhole21 said:
Plenty of posters on winneronline have sworn that RTG is rigged (at least before the late shift software came out). Well...if there was a "switch" then obviously Hamptons would have switched it to get out of this mess. So, at least one positive thing out of all of this is that we know RTG blackjack is honest.

There seem to be plenty of complaints about RTG casinos but I don't recall anyone complaining about the software, it is generally accepted to be fair.

My alternative conspiracy theory is that the casino manager turned the cheat knob in the wrong direction and it got stuck in that position. :)
 
LOL, a first time poster from Costa Rica calling ace a shill. If that's true, then his was the most mild shill post I've ever seen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top