Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Webmaster's Corner > SEO

Notices

SEO Search Engine Optimization discussions for webmeisters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3rd June 2009, 06:13 PM
lots0's Avatar
Call me Lucky...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: My own private Idaho
Posts: 1,705
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks: 1,190
Thanked 1,346 Times in 654 Posts
Nominated 21 Times in 7 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 7085
Rep Power: 58
lots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond repute
888.com Great Example of Blackhat SEO at work

Want to see what money will buy you???

888 is the most blacklisted casino site on the web.

888 has been blacklisted by dozens and dozens of websites/affiliates all across the web.

The many websites that have blacklisted 888 have even worked together in an effort to put their Blacklisted 888 pages in the SERP for the keywords like [blacklisted casino].

However, this is where the money and black hat SEO comes in...

If you do a search for [blacklisted casino], [casino blacklist] or any related keyword in google... none of the top 20 pages in google have a single page that has 888 Blacklisted...

High priced Blackhat SEO Reputation management at work...

888 has paid quite a bit of money to keep pages that Blacklist them off the front pages of the SERP...

I guarantee that if you talk to any webmaster that has Blacklisted 888... They will tell you how their site has been attacked by Blackhat SEO's and how the Blackhat SEO's tried to drop their ranking in the search engines...

888.com a real example of what Blackhat SEO can really do.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lots0 For This Useful Post:
Jasminebed (5th June 2009), jod5413 (3rd June 2009), RobWin (3rd June 2009), swampwitch (3rd June 2009), vegetagirl2008 (4th June 2009)
Old 6th June 2009, 04:21 AM
Webby
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 20
Rep Power: 0
John is on a distinguished road
That's some power they have. Impressive.
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2009, 05:55 PM
lots0's Avatar
Call me Lucky...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: My own private Idaho
Posts: 1,705
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks: 1,190
Thanked 1,346 Times in 654 Posts
Nominated 21 Times in 7 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 7085
Rep Power: 58
lots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond repute
Not impressive... Unless you find thieves and con artists 'impressive'.

But this whole 888 thing does make me angry.
Angry enough to talk to several google search engineers about what can be done about 888 and their little buddies like luckyace and 777...

And for the rest of you Webmasters, I suggest in the future you go directly to Google with complaints about 888 and their related sites.
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2009, 02:15 AM
Webby
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 20
Rep Power: 0
John is on a distinguished road
http://www.google.com/contact/spamreport.html
Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2009, 08:06 PM
GaryTheScubaGuy's Avatar
Webmeister
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leeds & London
Posts: 31
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 37 Times in 14 Posts
Nominated 7 Times in 1 Post
Nominated TOTW/F/M Award(s): 1
Reputation Points: 280
Rep Power: 5
GaryTheScubaGuy is a jewel in the roughGaryTheScubaGuy is a jewel in the roughGaryTheScubaGuy is a jewel in the rough
Yes unfortunately they do spend a bunch of money. Where they get away with it is that they also spend 1 million per month offline on things like FA Cup sponsorship and even loads more on Google PPC.

Google allowing bidding on gaming terms last October was another decision. That hasn't drawn enough income so now they are loosening the leash on brand bidding - especial with DKI !

This is why Google splits hairs and admitted that they DO practice brand preference when one stands out - but who makes that determination???

They are fortunate in that they get to make the rules, and then benefit from it.

Probably has nothing to do with the quality control team in Ireland...

I'm guessing their account receivables or their shareholders swing that gavel
Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2009, 08:42 AM
AussieDave's Avatar
crack that whip!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,258
WTGs: 24
WTGd at 125 Times in 14 Posts
Thanks: 501
Thanked 539 Times in 295 Posts
Nominated 2 Times in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 2878
Rep Power: 36
AussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond reputeAussieDave has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to AussieDave
Quote:
Originally Posted by lots0 View Post
I guarantee that if you talk to any webmaster that has Blacklisted 888... They will tell you how their site has been attacked by Blackhat SEO's and how the Blackhat SEO's tried to drop their ranking in the search engines...
I was one of those affiliates.
We managed to get a good lot of page 1 serps to begin. But as you commented 888 used black hat tactics to google bowl our sites out of the rankings.

For those interested here are the two articles I wrote about 888.com

XXXhttp://web.archive.org/web/20070106103036/www.wager2win.co.uk/888_sitescraping_rogue_affiliate_webmasters.html

XXXhttp://web.archive.org/web/20070106102834/www.wager2win.co.uk/ecogra_plays_favouritism_to_888.html


Cheers
T
Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2009, 08:59 AM
GaryTheScubaGuy's Avatar
Webmeister
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leeds & London
Posts: 31
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 37 Times in 14 Posts
Nominated 7 Times in 1 Post
Nominated TOTW/F/M Award(s): 1
Reputation Points: 280
Rep Power: 5
GaryTheScubaGuy is a jewel in the roughGaryTheScubaGuy is a jewel in the roughGaryTheScubaGuy is a jewel in the rough
How do you guys think 888 can get access to your webmaster central account to see that you have submitted them for buying links?

888 doesn't need to bh competiing sites. They have enough trust and authority and offline advertising that pulls direct searches, as well as Affiliate sites and online advertising that the traffic they get alone give them an unnatural boost.

If you are being bowled you are being bowled by other Affiliates or sites you beat out on specific keywords.

888 just like every other major gaming site has inhouse and outsourced SEO and/or link building services that get paid for positions and traffic and its much more likely they are the guilty parties rather than 888.

888 wouldn't take that risk, and for them to effectively and discreetly use this technique is a bit beyond their in-house teams ability. This I can assure you.
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2009, 05:14 PM
lots0's Avatar
Call me Lucky...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: My own private Idaho
Posts: 1,705
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks: 1,190
Thanked 1,346 Times in 654 Posts
Nominated 21 Times in 7 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 7085
Rep Power: 58
lots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond repute
I didn't think that Gigi was out there personally hacking wordpress blogs in order to set up the google bowling attacks... But he and the other board members of 888.com have allowed this kind of activity to be carried out in their behalf and for their personal gain for a very long time. Not the kind of behavior that US Regulators will like when the time comes around to issue Online licenses inside the USA...

I also don't buy the argument that google receives so much money from 888 that 888 gets 'special' access to information and special placement in the SERP.

Once google lets money directly influence their SERP, then the government gets a foot hold inside their company, (fair advertising) and the boys at google are more afraid of that than they are just about anything... So I think you will CONTINUE to see Google go wayyy out of their way to prove to the public and to the Government that advertising money does not effect their search results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy View Post
How do you guys think 888 can get access to your webmaster central account to see that you have submitted them for buying links?

888 doesn't need to bh competiing sites. They have enough trust and authority and offline advertising that pulls direct searches, as well as Affiliate sites and online advertising that the traffic they get alone give them an unnatural boost.

If you are being bowled you are being bowled by other Affiliates or sites you beat out on specific keywords.

888 just like every other major gaming site has inhouse and outsourced SEO and/or link building services that get paid for positions and traffic and its much more likely they are the guilty parties rather than 888.

888 wouldn't take that risk, and for them to effectively and discreetly use this technique is a bit beyond their in-house teams ability. This I can assure you.
__________________
Gambling... the ultimate in optimism.
Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 12:01 PM
Webzcas's Avatar
Moderator - Webmeister Section
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Block F, Atyeo Stand, Ashton Gate every other Saturday
Posts: 1,167
WTGs: 14
WTGd at 92 Times in 16 Posts
Thanks: 387
Thanked 4,294,967,295 Times in 243 Posts
Nominated 4 Times in 4 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3551
Rep Power: 15
Webzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond reputeWebzcas has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Webzcas
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy View Post
How do you guys think 888 can get access to your webmaster central account to see that you have submitted them for buying links?

888 doesn't need to bh competiing sites. They have enough trust and authority and offline advertising that pulls direct searches, as well as Affiliate sites and online advertising that the traffic they get alone give them an unnatural boost.

If you are being bowled you are being bowled by other Affiliates or sites you beat out on specific keywords.

888 just like every other major gaming site has inhouse and outsourced SEO and/or link building services that get paid for positions and traffic and its much more likely they are the guilty parties rather than 888.

888 wouldn't take that risk, and for them to effectively and discreetly use this technique is a bit beyond their in-house teams ability. This I can assure you.
I am inclined to agree. It is more likely 888's top affiliates and therefore our competitors who are using underhand techniques.

I haven't used google adwords for my gambling domains as of yet, but I have recently been running several adwords campaigns for my political site and it is interesting that my natural serps have moved upwards since I started throwing some money towards adwords.
__________________
"Because the stadium will be slightly red in colour, I'm slightly concerned that its going to look like a brothel" - Councillor commenting on Bristol City Football Club's planning application for a new stadium to be built

CasinoMeister Forum FAQ | Casino Forum Reps | CasinoMeister Accredited Casinos | Forum Rules

My Websites: Online Casino Reviewer ~ Politics & Current Affairs ~ BetSage ~ Leading Casino
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More work for the FGA! jetset Casino Industry Discussion 2 4th January 2006 06:06 PM
Would this work? FMMonty Online Casinos 1 9th December 2005 07:42 PM
Do you think this will work? b_poker Casinomeister's Poker Room 4 21st January 2005 02:15 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2009


  Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Slots Guide | Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews | Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Online Slots | Online Casino Reviews

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.

Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk