No I disagreed with you and gave you the proof that you were wrong.
Let's not be coy - that's exactly what you were referring toI never said anything about using 'social book marks' I specifically wrote 'spam' links... So I guess your saying that what your doing with social bookmarks is SPAM...![]()
No, not at all. If you read through the thread I even made an effort not to be critical or demeaning.If you want to debate when this major change in the google algo went live, I have no problem with that...
All I wrote was that yes it came out, but sometime ago. It seems you took the offence and became critical - as far as to say,"You folks be careful where you get SEO advice from... "However, it sounds to me like you just want to pick a fight... and I'd rather not waste my time.
Lots0 you should take a step back and look at your posts - especially the underlying tone you take.FYI - Scuba guy, I am not taking on any SEO clients, I stopped taking SEO clients several years ago, I am not your competition here...
I'm not here for clients. I've posted at SEO Chat for years, on CAP, and recenlty on GPWA and here. The latter two people; Bryan and Michael Corfman, I met in Amsterdam and decided to spend time contributing.
That's what I do. I give free advice. Ask anyone in this industry that knows me. The key is that its not rhetoric. I spend a lot of resources questioning theories and my own ideas and I share them...its that simple.
Very few affiliates could even afford my services (unfortunately) but if that were the case I would probably spend time on boards that had a much larger subscription base. I like Bryan, he's an American and former military as I am in both cases, plus I just think he's a cool guy.
So no, there are no conspiracy theories or argument provocations coming from my side, but again I think you should re-read.
Cheers,
Gary




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks