Who's getting wound up? I'm just trying to have a civilised discussion... some people get wound up if they win or lose !!
![]() |
![]() |
Who's getting wound up? I'm just trying to have a civilised discussion... some people get wound up if they win or lose !!
6 month loosing in a row : I do understand your frustration!!!
As most MGS players know,something has changed a couple of years ago.
Pay-outs have become lower,and of course there is no casino rep who will admit this.I also understand it is impossible for them to admit it.
It is not only 32Red where it happened, for me they have always been the best regarding pay-out and there support is excellent and the best one can find.Right now it is the only online casino where I still am playing.
Like you I play at 32Red more than 5 years, almost on a daily basis.
Since the beginning of 2011, my losses are very big and I am not going to wait 6 months(like you) before I will close my account there too.
That will be the end of online gambling for me,and it then will be the best decision I have taken in 5 years.
mippsaublue (27th February 2011)
If the payouts are lower in card games* compared to what they should statistically be then 32Red may be involved in fraud. They are eCogra sealed and eCogra requires the odds of the games to follow exactly the same odds as a physical game with corresponding rules. For example, Classic Blackjack delivers a 99.91% payout rate with basic strategy and this payout rate would have to be reached at 32Red as well, or the games are fraudulent.
Regarding these concerns, I had a PM discussion with Pat Harrison. He only gave me evading answers and refused to provide any audit proof that the games deliver expected return percentages. So much for their complete transparency...
* I am focusing on card games instead of slots as the return percentages and variances are clearly defined in card games, and the differences in observed vs. expected return percentages can be accurately statisically measured using various techniques.
mippsaublue (1st March 2011)
True, however the average player error rate is measurable as well, and many might be surprised how small the extent of increased house edge due to player errors actually is. A study in Las Vegas B&M casinos showed player errors to increase the HE around 0.8%. Given the easier access to basic strategy tables online as well as correct autoplay strategy implemented within Microgaming software, I would expect the error rate to be even lower than 0.8% at MG casinos. So an audit report showing a 99.0% payout rate might be accetable, but not much lower than that.
The problem with video poker is it's high variance, so a 95% return is not a least bit abnormal as the return percentage will shoot up every time you hit a royal. The games where it is the easiest to prove manipulation are the low house edge, low variance games such as blackjack.
With basic strategy Microgaming Classic Blackjack has a 99.87% return.
I am sure you mean; with composition dependent strategy.
I have run VP simulations and if you leave the simulator on long enough it always hits the expected return of the game.
You could do this with BJ as well. It would take much less time to see the expected return in BJ compared to VP.
Bookmarks