Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: THIS BILL RAISES ISSUES THAT SHOULD CONCERN ALL CITIZENS

  1. #1
    footdr is offline Banned User: PITA violations of the Forum Rules
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    cyberspace
    Posts
    1,570
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 552 Times in 341 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 3072

    THIS BILL RAISES ISSUES THAT SHOULD CONCERN ALL CITIZENS

    My concern is how many bills are passed using this method. It seems that the elected officials we put in office are not being allowed to debate important issues or actually vote on a certain bill if it is allowed to be attached to a bill that is sure to pass and become law.

    That is an issue that should concern all U.S. citizens regardless if they approve of gambling online or not.

    This is not the way laws should be enacted! The President should veto any bill that contains provisions which were not seperately debated upon and approved by our represenatives. This is a loss of rights. The right to choose how we spend our money. That issue also affects all citizens.

    The problem is no one cares anymore. There is a sence of helplessness. We have no real way to voice our opinions except our votes. Even then it seems once elected the senators and congressman do not always do as they promised. I have decided long ago that we need centrist in office. Individuals that vote based on the issue at hand, not along party lines. Not for political reasons but for the interest of citizens and willingness to hold to the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have further taken away our individual rights and privacy. People had better start voicing their objections, it is only getting worse.

    Face it, we have no way to even let our elected President know our feelings on any subject. We need a change in the way a bill can be passed into law. Our elected Representatives should demand that this underhanded means not be allowed.

  2. #2
    darkpixie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    660
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 172 Times in 107 Posts
    Rep Power
    33
    Reputation Points: 961
    First step get that asshole Bush out of office. And if I offended any backwoods idiots that actually voted for that jackass I am un-apologetic.
    Second be revolutionary, if the people you have voted to serve the people are not serving the people then serve yourselves. Find loopholes, find any way you can continue living your life in the norm. If enough people do this collectively the decision will crash and burn.
    Also, get rid of Bush

  3. #3
    Reef is offline Experienced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    147
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts
    Rep Power
    27
    Reputation Points: 143
    Make sure Frist does NOT win presidency. Vote Democratic.

  4. #4
    pokeraddict's Avatar
    pokeraddict is offline Webmaster Achievements:
    Meister ReferrerVeteran10000 Experience PointsReferral Meister Second ClassFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,786
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 763 Times in 372 Posts
    Rep Power
    68
    Reputation Points: 4171
    Quote Originally Posted by Reef View Post
    Make sure Frist does NOT win presidency. Vote Democratic.
    I would even vote for Hillary Clinton first .

  5. #5
    jeremiahsjohnso is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 25
    People have been logrolling unrelated measures onto bills long before Bush. I detest the practice, but it's often used to get members to compromise and pass things that otherwise would be held up. Have you not seen the Simpsons episode with the paperclipped rider? Not so far from the truth.

    And plenty of important legislation/action goes through with just about zero congressional oversight. Like wars, for example. Or Affirmative Action, which, merits aside, should have at least been decided by Congress. Instead it got passed through Executive Order. (Which, itself, is an overly abused privilege.)

    The US gov't is getting closer to "how can we get everyone to leave so we can start over mode." The Democratic leadership of about 10 years ago wasn't any better or worse than the current crap.

  6. #6
    darkpixie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    660
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 172 Times in 107 Posts
    Rep Power
    33
    Reputation Points: 961
    Yup saw that Simpsons, good episode

Similar Threads

  1. Senator Frist's Web Site indicated Bill has passed
    By footdr in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 4th October 2006, 11:42 AM
  2. Online Poker Players Face Legal Issues
    By Lord_Have_Mercy in forum Casinomeister's Poker Room
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 6th August 2006, 09:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.