Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: WTO Legalizes Music Piracy in Antigua

  1. #1
    thisisvegas's Avatar
    thisisvegas is offline Online Gaming Affiliate Manager
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    144
    Thanks
    116
    Thanked 383 Times in 98 Posts
    Rep Power
    28
    Reputation Points: 1955

    WTO Legalizes Music Piracy in Antigua

    Here is an interesting article I read today at Gambling911

    http://www.gambling911.com/WTO-Onlin...ua-122407.html

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to thisisvegas For This Useful Post:

    Simmo! (24th December 2007)

  3. #2
    Simmo!'s Avatar
    Simmo! is offline Moderator Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial Magnet!Tagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    You say UK, I say England.
    Posts
    9,274
    Thanks
    1,694
    Thanked 4,372 Times in 2,079 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 23379
    Great article.

    Interesting - it points out the US are complaining that China are not observing their WTO commitments on music and film, yet are happy to turn round and stick two fingers up at the WTO in the case of online gambling.

    But, like online gambling was sacrificed by the EU recently to curry favour in more "influential" sectors, it seems that the US has offered up musicians and the film industry as the sacrificial lambs at their end in the Antiguan case. I feel for them - its the last thing a struggling music industry needs.

    Bottom line: politics stinks.


  4. #3
    jetset's Avatar
    jetset is offline Ueber Meister Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouTagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    12,357
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,063
    Thanked 5,467 Times in 2,355 Posts
    Rep Power
    257
    Reputation Points: 30011
    The bottom line here is that the US has put the whole concept of fair world trade in question by pretty much doing what it wants, and suffering relatively minor retribution or censure from the WTO for doing so.

    And judging by subsequent reports, it looks as if the USTR is trying wriggle out of even the few concessions to the EU, Canada and Japan with all this talk of "no new concessions, just 'clarification' of existing informal arrangements etc etc."

    The principal of this whole affair stinks, I agree - the value of retaliation awarded to Antigua is $21 million dollars a year and that is hardly likely to make a major impact imo on a business as vast as the music industry despite Mark Mendel's comments that: "Although the online gambling industry would see the $21 million per year limitation as a setback, Mendel highlighted that for a start as of now, they can cumulatively add the amount for 2006 combined with that for 2007, and the sanctioned amount will add up to hundreds of millions of dollars after a few years."

    He does however, make a more telling point that: "More worryingly for the US music industry, this will also include the right to distribute digital music and as anyone who deals in this will be only too aware, there is no reliable recourse to monitor revenues, and for all practical purposes it seems that Antigua is basically getting an unlimited free pass to gorge themselves silly on US copyrighted and trademarked products.."

    I feel some sympathy for the US film and music industry which is being expected to carry the can for infringements by the US in a totally unrelated industry.

    Judging by other reports, the WTO panel only took into consideration the impact of horseracing protectionism in reaching the disappointingly low figure.

    I'm also suspicious of the inability (or unwillingness) of either the EU negotiators or the USTR to even attempt to quantify the value of the "concessions" that the US made to appease the EU, Canada and Japan.

    Because the arbitration is non-appealable (unless the Americans start extending their protectionism on Internet gambling beyond horseracing, lotteries and fantasy sports) it puts the Antiguans in an unfortunate spot. Their legal counsel Mark Mendel has already said that he will go after the US again if it tries to do this.

    All in all, the US has escaped with very little cost for its actions, and in the process has hardly added to the credibility of the WTO.
    jetset

  5. #4
    NASHVEGAS is offline Banned User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    MERS
    Posts
    2,235
    Thanks
    3,318
    Thanked 2,533 Times in 1,146 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 13325
    Quote Originally Posted by jetset View Post
    The bottom line here is that the US has put the whole concept of fair world trade in question by pretty much doing what it wants, and suffering relatively minor retribution or censure from the WTO for doing so.

    And judging by subsequent reports, it looks as if the USTR is trying wriggle out of even the few concessions to the EU, Canada and Japan with all this talk of "no new concessions, just 'clarification' of existing informal arrangements etc etc."

    The principal of this whole affair stinks, I agree - the value of retaliation awarded to Antigua is $21 million dollars a year and that is hardly likely to make a major impact imo on a business as vast as the music industry despite Mark Mendel's comments that: "Although the online gambling industry would see the $21 million per year limitation as a setback, Mendel highlighted that for a start as of now, they can cumulatively add the amount for 2006 combined with that for 2007, and the sanctioned amount will add up to hundreds of millions of dollars after a few years."

    He does however, make a more telling point that: "More worryingly for the US music industry, this will also include the right to distribute digital music and as anyone who deals in this will be only too aware, there is no reliable recourse to monitor revenues, and for all practical purposes it seems that Antigua is basically getting an unlimited free pass to gorge themselves silly on US copyrighted and trademarked products.."

    I feel some sympathy for the US film and music industry which is being expected to carry the can for infringements by the US in a totally unrelated industry.

    Judging by other reports, the WTO panel only took into consideration the impact of horseracing protectionism in reaching the disappointingly low figure.

    I'm also suspicious of the inability (or unwillingness) of either the EU negotiators or the USTR to even attempt to quantify the value of the "concessions" that the US made to appease the EU, Canada and Japan.

    Because the arbitration is non-appealable (unless the Americans start extending their protectionism on Internet gambling beyond horseracing, lotteries and fantasy sports) it puts the Antiguans in an unfortunate spot. Their legal counsel Mark Mendel has already said that he will go after the US again if it tries to do this.

    All in all, the US has escaped with very little cost for its actions, and in the process has hardly added to the credibility of the WTO.
    Oh the irony,Frist of Nashville screws the people and companies of his own city known as Music City!

Similar Threads

  1. Online poker and music combine
    By jetset in forum Casinomeister's Poker Room
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14th June 2007, 06:52 PM
  2. Antigua wins WTO case
    By jetset in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 12th April 2007, 06:00 PM
  3. Music Hall Cancels Check
    By slotguy in forum Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 27th February 2007, 02:02 AM
  4. Music Hall Casino - Your thoughts?
    By milemaster in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 4th January 2007, 11:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.