The Archives

[steve]

Well I just went over to post in this round table discussion. What I found was one casino manager posting. And now everyone wants to form a players association. I think you should and put the OPA out of business, god knows how sick and tired I am of all the lying, backstabbing, crooked bastards in this industry.

Hall of shame? I mentioned that a couple of months ago and sent you people into a ••••••• tizzy. Why two people even quit the OPA in a very public setting because of this idea I had.
Now its a good idea, umm I see. Posting chargeback players names?

Luckyme whats up with that? Everyone said you were up to no good with your offer. Sounds like you all know what you want to do. Form your own free organization and bash the OPA every chance you get. I think all you should form your very own players organization to handle things like complaints, good casinos, bad casinos, and you can fight the OCMA to get them to close down.

My understanding is that ideas were going to be discussed concerning player privacy issues. Maybe I misunderstood something somewhere.
Instead I see a lot of ass kissing! yeah you all got it under control.
Anyway, count me out. And I would prefer that only OPA stuff is posted in the OPA forum.

Traffic seekers can go elsewhere.

[AmateurSleuth]

This is a perfect topic for the "OPA Newsletter". It seems to me that this would be a great way to solicit ideas, and inform the membership that such an idea is on the table.

I am sure that quite a few members would and could arrange to be in Vegas in October, provided notice was given.

A convention requires bodies. And one aspect of an OPA convention is to unite and inform both the membership, and the industry that the OPA is a viable organization with members who have a few dollars in their pockets. Correct.

Of course, as Mary said, a "Convention" would require (yuck!!) a speaker or two, or (yuck!!) a seminar or two, just to break up the gambling. How about a (yuck!!) booth, to announce the OPA's "arrival" to the populace and the industry, and get the OPA's message out.

You asked for suggestion. That's mine, sort of.

[Hula hoop]

What a good idea

and the OPA casinos who are approved can thro a few $$'s into the pot to pay for it, cool idea and free advertising for the OPA approved casinos

get on with it steve

chop chop

[spearmaster]

Speaker?

Actually, I think that could be interesting, but a tournament sounds more interesting.

Let me check around and see who might be interested in talking...

[don_gambler]

Spearmaster, Have to spoken to the owners of this casino yet? If so what do they have to say about all this?

[spearmaster]

Waiting for a response by email - if it doesn't come I will call them.

Weird, that - don't know why he doesn't check his personal email that often but I never have any trouble calling...

[blue eyes austin]

Spear, I've just submitted an OPA complaint on this lot as well.

Blue

[spearmaster]

OK.

I was reading some of the complaints - while I had the owner on the phone as well.

Apparently many of the problems are because of people depositing and not wagering 1x. Owner agrees that 4X bonus after it is received is sufficient, but 1x deposit is required in order to receive the bonus.

In any case - anyone who want a quick resolution please send amount and account # to me at webmaster@got2bet.com ASAP - he promised me that he would answer these queries within 24 hours.

[Lucky]

"Apparently many of the problems are because of people depositing and not wagering 1x. Owner agrees that 4X bonus after it is received is sufficient, but 1x deposit is required in order to receive the bonus."


Im sure you have heard are complaints on this spear. The 1xD was NEVER specified until afterward. The webpage was changed late sunday, yet they claim to have changed it on friday. They are lying! I've already wagered the BS that they told me to-But im wondering if the "resolution" you promise would include them sticking by the ORIGINAL terms they have up and sent out in the email?

[spearmaster]

I'm kinda 50-50 on this.

Under normal circumstances, one would be required to wager at least 1xD before receiving a bonus. However, in this case it seems there is confusion as to whether this was required, and when the conditions were updated.

Those of you who have already agreed to the change, I highly doubt we can set back the clock. Those of you who have not proceeded since discovering the problem, please let me know if you would like some assistance.

I also have a copy of the email - and they know I do. They have given me their assurance that they will work to resolve any unsolved problems.

I also believe that 4xB is what the terms and conditions of the bonus are. However, there is ALSO a disclaimer on their site, which gives them the right to withhold a promotion to certain players at their own discretion.

I am working with them to get things changed so that this will not happen again. But I certainly am unable to undo what has already been done for those of you meeting their new terms.

If anyone has any other claims, problems, issues etc. please let me know and I'll see if I can get an answer.