Jesus... I was really triying to be diplomatic. I really have to have the one more word if you're throwing silly bets in my face now, and in a gambling forum no less.
I'll send you my Paypal address, would you like to pay that $10,000 at once or in montly installments?
I said "direct channel to Google via a dedicated rep" and that Google can fix things like this from the backend. I have a dedicated rep and numerous others have as well. You decided to change it to " 'direct Channel' to Google's backend" for whatever reason. That's what they call a straw man argument in debate class.
Moreover, we were talking about Wikipedia before you decided to make another unilateral shift in subject... Yes, I would fully expect that if a representative of Wikipedia called Google, they would respond to the issue. Yes, I'm sure Wiki has Google's number. I'm sure they could even stoll right up to the Googleplex's front desk and probably would if something so catastrophic happened as they lost their domain.
Again, I can't say one way or the other about Bodog. It's either the algos or some assistance from Google. You're acting like going from bodog.com to newbodog.com is something more complex than a simple redirect. It's not. Yes, I would expcet a company as wired as Bodog to have the email of a contact at Google... it's not that hard. No, I don't think Bodog has enough pull to be able to just phone Google. No, I'm not insisting that Google assisted Bodog directly, but it realistically could have been the case.
Again, I can't say what happend. I can say what didn't happen and that's the Bodog enginers know something that the rest of us don't and can game Google's multi-billion dollar algo in a week's time. If that's the case, why no luck in Yahoo and MSN? Couldn't they work thier magic there too?
Lastly I disagree totally with the premise that Google doesn't care, Google does care about making sure their SERPs are relevant and yes they do respond to inquires... even if there is no direct Adsense or Adwords profit involved. Authority sites (whether in the algos or from direct contact) get special treatment (as they should). I guess Google just works hard not to look like Yahoo and MSN which at the moment have dead links to bodog.com coming up in the top of their results for "bodog". Again, I'm not saying what happened, only speculating about what are reasonable possibilities and what aren't.
Now, let's PLEASE stop this tiresome off-topic rant and let's just agree to disagree, ok? So... thank you very much for your insightful comments Mr. lots0, but I respectfully disagree with just about everything you have had to say today... but it was great fun.
Now if you want to debate the stylistic flourish that is CA's thumb ring, you're on.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks