View Single Post
Old 30th April 2006, 12:23 AM
Simmo!'s Avatar
Simmo! Simmo! is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Engerland
Posts: 7,542
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 87 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks: 1,178
Thanked 2,831 Times in 1,379 Posts
Nominated 7 Times in 4 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 15080
Rep Power: 15
Simmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelawnet
As Andreas says, proof can easily be obtained with a small sample if the cheating is as blatant as it is here.

So far we have

18 wins
27 losses
25 wins
65 losses
40 wins
55 losses
and
84 wins
151 losses

Taken together, that is
167 wins, 298 losses

The chances of that happening from a fair game is 1.5 billion to one

There is not even one sample where wins are close to losses

1.5 billion to one is enough to convince anyone.

Fair enough. I'll leave you to it then TLN
__________________

++++ The Big Casino List [MK II] ++++ Slotjunkies [MK II] ++++