View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 30th April 2006, 12:23 AM
Simmo!'s Avatar
Simmo! Simmo! is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Engerland
Posts: 7,134
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 71 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 1,056
Thanked 2,459 Times in 1,198 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 13038
Rep Power: 15
Simmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelawnet
As Andreas says, proof can easily be obtained with a small sample if the cheating is as blatant as it is here.

So far we have

18 wins
27 losses
25 wins
65 losses
40 wins
55 losses
and
84 wins
151 losses

Taken together, that is
167 wins, 298 losses

The chances of that happening from a fair game is 1.5 billion to one

There is not even one sample where wins are close to losses

1.5 billion to one is enough to convince anyone.

Fair enough. I'll leave you to it then TLN
__________________

++++ Blue Square Casino Review ++++ Microgaming & The USA - Updates ++++ USA Casinos (By State) ++++
++++ ++++