Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Simmo!
From what I've seen so far, the "proof" is looking like it may have some cause for further investigation, but I think you need to move away from the argument about what is/isn't constituting proof and get more results in.
|
As Andreas says, proof can easily be obtained with a small sample if the cheating is as blatant as it is here.
So far we have
18 wins
27 losses
25 wins
65 losses
40 wins
55 losses
and
84 wins
151 losses
Taken together, that is
167 wins, 298 losses
The chances of that happening from a fair game is 1.5 billion to one
There is not even one sample where wins are close to losses
1.5 billion to one is enough to convince anyone.