Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gfkostas
Well said, I hear you
|
That is not well said at all.
In many events, statistical proof can be obtained with a relatively small sample size.
For example say I run a coin-flip game. I rig it so that it's not 50/50, but instead its 49.9999/50.0001 in my favor. In this case someone will need a very large sample size to prove that the game is rigged.
Now say I rig it so that it is 20/80 in my favor. Now someone will need a very small sample to prove it's rigged. Something in the order of 50 tries should be more than enough.
In the case of the EH doubling game the statistical proof is overwhelming, especially when you factor in the results of other forum members who tested.
It is flat out impossible that this game represent an honest representation of a doubling game, and any mathematician will agree.