View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29th April 2006, 06:07 AM
Linus Linus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 262
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 38
Thanked 65 Times in 45 Posts
Reputation Points: 373
Rep Power: 16
Linus is just really niceLinus is just really niceLinus is just really niceLinus is just really nice
I'm not enough of a mathematician to say whether your results prove anything or not. But in one respect, at least, you're wrong - the larger the sample, the more meaningful it is. It's not the other way around.

Try running it by the Wizard of Odds, and see what he says (he's busted a casino for cheating before). You might also try the "Probability" section at 2+2. There are some smart math guys there, who are very helpful.