Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Simmo!
My understanding is that it is simply that eGOGRA do not see dealing with affiliate issues as part of their remit.
|
Simmo! imo there lays the problem. Again imo this industry holds an incestuous <improperly intimate or interconnected: “Press-politics relations are notoriously incestuous” (Boston Globe). > history of letting things slide and or playing double standards when it suits, not with standing conflict of interests either.
In my mind even though this type of event may not be in their <eCogra's> charter, it would seem to me that as John Anderson is the CEO of the Company <CON - 888> directly in the firing line over such an issue it would be grounds enough for eCogra to get involved, remit or otherwise.
I'm not saying that eCogra should take a public stand on this matter. However, given that its foundation were built on funds from CON and maybe still functions with ongoing funds from this benefactor, in my view it would be a wise initiative to conduct its own in house enquiries regarding this matter. Least to prevent such issues from returning to bit eCogra on its ass.
To simple take the
head in the sand route could very well turn out to be a BIG mistake.