View Single Post
Old 28th March 2006, 09:42 PM
spearmaster's Avatar
spearmaster spearmaster is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 5,822
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 3 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 401
Thanked 1,013 Times in 506 Posts
Nominated 9 Times in 5 Posts
Nominated TOTW/F/M Award(s): 1
Reputation Points: 6137
Rep Power: 95
spearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKDafoe
The US Justice Department considers all internet gambling to be illegal. Why does Grand Prive care about laws regarding age in the United States when the same legal system essentially prohibits all internet gambling at any age?
Because it's technically not the same legal system - the federal system currently has no jurisdiction over gambling, allowing each state to assert its own laws. The only law in the federal system which governs online betting - not gambling - is the Wire Act, and this has already been held to apply only to sports betting by at least one federal court in Louisiana.

Not wishing to rehash what has been discussed on the other forum, I'll just state my opinion briefly, which is that both sides share the blame, and that the operator needs to make a move towards meeting halfway at the very least because its share of the blame is arguably more than that of the player's.