Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Casinomeister
They said they're handling this internally.
|
Obviously that's as unacceptable as it's unsurprising.
Excuse me? Sanctions for the first stunt and a warning to not do it again, so they do it again and...nothing?
If this is the sum total of their public response then Kahnawake will be officially the licensing joke they proved themselves during the Golden Palace saga six years ago.
Quote:
|
Notwithstanding the fact that GP’s website does not specifically address “bonus abuse”, we find that the activities of the complainants were such that they breached the implied condition of good faith that exists between any two parties to an agreement.
|
http://mb.winneronline.com/showpost....40&postcount=6
Remarkable isn't it? They're quite happy for one of their license holders to sabotage the premier international sporting event, year in, year out, and equally happy to sanction Golden Palace winnings-confiscations those six years ago - while being so remarkably apparently committed to "player protection":
http://www.ecogra.org/Press/Release.asp?ReleaseID=35
Quote:
|
The (Kahnawake) Commission will continue to use its own methodologies in conducting due diligence investigations on all applicants to determine their suitability as Kahnawá:ke licensees.
|
So sabotage of the Olympics, two times running, and Golden Palace pass Kahnawake's "due diligence"?
What do you have to do to NOT pass Kahnawake's "due diligence"?
Excuse me if I'm currently falling off my chair in hysterics - it's like these people think we're all total imbeciles. Kahnawake could not have proven themselves LESS committed to player protection and LESS capable as a "license" provider, yet they think this pontificating with empty, meaningless words is going to mean something.
It's truly beyond belief.